Submissions:2018/Working with new editors: observations from a Wikipedia Content Expert


 * Title: Working with new editors: observations from a Wikipedia Content Expert


 * Theme (optional): Editor Recruitment & Retention


 * Academic Peer Review option: No


 * Type of submission: Presentation


 * Author: Ian Ramjohn


 * E-mail address: ian@wikiedu.org


 * Wikimedia username: Ian (Wiki Ed) / Guettarda


 * Affiliation(s) (optional): Wiki Education Foundation


 * Abstract:

What brings new editors to Wikipedia? For most of our history, the reasons have been diverse, but for one pool of new editors, the reason is simple: they’re here because their professor told them to be. Over the past four years, Wiki Education has brought 43,000 student editors to Wikipedia, and I’ve supported about half of that number.

Student editors have the potential to make large contributions to Wikipedia that are successfully integrated into the encyclopaedia, or term papers that sit untouched, because no one can figure out how to turn them into encyclopaedia articles. Some student contributions can achieve Good Article status with little modification, while others need to be extensively reworked just to remain in the article.

In this talk I will discuss my observations about the challenges that new student editors face, and some of the successes they have achieved. I will discuss the barriers they face, and interventions that can help students who have encountered problems get back on track. Sometimes just switching the first and second paragraphs of the lead can change an “essay like” draft into the beginnings of a viable encyclopaedia article. At other times, it takes more effort. Paying attention to what works and what doesn’t allows us to adapt our feedback and training materials to meet these needs.

When I started in this role, I had a decade of Wikipedia experience and a decade of experience as an instructor in higher education; I thought I knew what students needed to know to write Wikipedia articles. I’ve learned a lot about how students think about Wikipedia, and how they interpret their interactions with other Wikipedians. While some of my observations are specific to students, much of this applies to all new editors, and I will discuss ways in which these could be applied to efforts to help other groups of new Wikipedians contribution to the project.


 * Length of presentation: 30


 * Special requests:


 * Preferred room size: 25


 * Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?: No


 * If you will be incorporating a slidedeck during your presentation, do you agree to upload it to Commons before your session, with a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license, including suitable attribution in the slidedeck for any images used?: Yes


 * Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?: Yes

Interested attendees
'''If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. ( ~ ).'''


 * 1) Matthewvetter (talk) 02:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 2) &#91;&#91;User:Checkingfax&#93;&#93; (talk) 07:26, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 3) LingLass (talk) 21:43, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 4) Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 5) WWB (talk) 05:30, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 6) Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 7) JNova7 (talk) 00:03, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 8) Airplaneman (talk) 06:15, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 9) Norwegianblue (talk) 19:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 10) Jami (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 11) Another Believer (talk) 14:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)