Submissions:2018/Wikipedia’s Gender Gap and Disciplinary Praxis: Representing Women Scholars in Digital Rhetoric and Writing Fields


 * Title: Wikipedia’s Gender Gap and Disciplinary Praxis: Representing Women Scholars in Digital Rhetoric and Writing Fields


 * Theme (optional): Inclusion & Diversity


 * Academic Peer Review option:  Yes


 * Type of submission: Presentation


 * Author: Matthew Vetter


 * E-mail address:


 * Wikimedia username: Matthewvetter


 * Affiliation(s) (optional): Indiana University of Pennsyvania

Wikipedia’s gender gaps, the result of a predominance of male editors and the correlating uneven participation and coverage of marginalized groups, are by now both well-known and well-documented (Cohen, 2011; Collier and Bear, 2012; Glott, Schmidt, and Ghosh, 2010; Gruwell, 2015; Wadewitz, 2013). This presentation reports on an attempt to interrogate these gaps in coverage as they manifest in discipline-specific representations, especially representations related to the academic fields of computers and writing, digital literacy, and digital rhetoric. Preliminary analysis of Wikipedia articles related to these fields demonstrates a severe lack of coverage, which, given these fields’ attention to digital literacies, should be improved. This presentation reports on a bibliometric method of citation analysis (Eyman, 2015; Kaur, Radicchi, and Menczer, 2013) across five Wikipedia articles related to these fields in order to show how the gender gap manifests in the absence of cited research by non-male scholars. To address these content gaps, this project moves beyond analysis to define and engage in acts of critical digital praxis within Wikipedia, asking students to edit the encyclopedia to improve representation of women and women’s research in computers and writing and digital rhetoric fields. Descriptions of such editorial work and its implications, furthermore, provide a model for disciplinary praxis, and graduate pedagogy, in which students and professor work together to engage in the critique and remediation of Wikipedia’s disciplinary content and gender gaps. As a larger example of critical digital analysis and participation, this presentation also describes efforts to unpack and critique the ways in which media, even those professing an open-access and democratic ethic, perpetuate social hegemonies of marginalization.
 * Abstract:


 * Length of presentation: 20 min


 * Special requests: Please do not schedule during the workshop I have also submitted with Alexandria Lockett. Technology requirements - Capability for slide show


 * Preferred room size: 10-15


 * Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?: No


 * If you will be incorporating a slidedeck during your presentation, do you agree to upload it to Commons before your session, with a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license, including suitable attribution in the slidedeck for any images used?: Yes


 * Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?: Yes

Interested attendees
'''If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. ( ~ ).'''


 * 1) Mosterbur (talk) 15:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Mosterbur
 * 2) Mozucat (talk) 20:17, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 3) Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 20:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 4) Rosiestep (talk) 15:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 5) Samantha (Wiki Education) (talk) 17:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 6) BobCummings (talk) 21:34, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 7) JNova7 (talk) 00:17, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 8) Jami (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)