Edit WCNA 2021 Session Submission: Submissions:2021/Wikipedia as Information Literacy Vector: Authority and Undergraduate Students

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

Submission for Wikipedia as Information Literacy Vector: Authority and Undergraduate Students

Theme
Global & Local Relationship Building & Support Inclusion & Diversity Depth & Breadth for Newer Editors Tech & Tools Harassment Civility & Safety Other

Type of session

Abstract
Please describe your proposal in at least 300 words.
If you have any relevant webpages, slidedecks, etc., you may link them here.

We are two librarians who teach an undergraduate Introduction to Information Studies course.  In this presentation, we will argue that using Wikipedia in the classroom helps students develop information literacy skills. In particular we’ll focus on the concept that Authority is Constructed and Contextual, which is a foundational concept from the Association of College and Research Libraries’ Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework). We’ll explain how we incorporate Wikipedia in class with students working to improve one article over a series of three scaffolded projects.

We see students’ work with Wikipedia as especially rich for grappling with authority because of the variety of roles students undertake as they edit. Initially, students must integrate into the Wikipedia community, which has its own measures of authority that may differ from academia’s traditional notions.  We see students grappling with preconceived ideas of Wikipedia’s acceptance in the classroom, with many of our students reporting that previous teachers had banned Wikipedia “because anyone could edit it.”  As students unpack this during our course, they begin to be able to see and understand the process behind a Wikipedia article rather than just the product. For example, they evaluate the article’s degree of authoritativeness based on markers like sources, editors, and history. When editing, students must also decide what sources are authoritative and understand how source authoritativeness varies depending on context. What is appropriate for a Wikipedia article may not be appropriate for an academic essay and vice versa.  As students step into the author role themselves, there’s more at stake here than a traditional research essay. As they become public scholars, their work is immediately available to anyone looking at their article, including opening their work up to evaluations from the Wikipedia community rather than just their instructor.  Wikipedia as a platform offers a unique opportunity for students to step beyond academic research and into real-world application.

Academic Peer Review option
Select this option if you are making an academic submission that you would like evaluated by a subset of academics serving on the Program Committee. Learn more here.

Author name

E-mail address
To avoid spambots, use {{@}} in place of @

Wikimedia username

Affiliated organization(s) (optional)
The organization, company, Wikimedia affiliate, etc. that you are representing, if applicable.

Estimated time

Special requests

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

Submit for review or draft?
Select whether you are ready to submit this proposal for review, or would like to have it marked as a draft for you to continue working on it.
Submit Draft

If you are creating a slide deck for your presentation, please upload it to the Wikimedia Commons with a free license, and include all suitable attribution in the slide deck for any images used.

Watch this page

Edit WCNA 2021 Session Submission: Submissions:2021/Wikipedia as Information Literacy Vector: Authority and Undergraduate Students

Navigation menu

Search