Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kirill Lokshin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bluerasberry (talk | contribs) (deletion...) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I understand why they might be better deleted, though. [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 12:06, 1 September 2015 (EDT) |
I understand why they might be better deleted, though. [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 12:06, 1 September 2015 (EDT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :I see a distinction between a legitimate submission that doesn't get accepted, for whatever reason, and promotional material entirely unrelated to the conference. In the former case, I agree with you completely; in the latter case, on the other hand, we're not going to continue hosting it just because it came in via a submission form. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]] ([[User talk:Kirill Lokshin|talk]]) 12:36, 1 September 2015 (EDT) |
||
Revision as of 16:36, 1 September 2015
Deletion of out of scope submissions
Must out of scope submissions be deleted? Can they not be just labeled out of scope? I would still like these people to attend the event, and for people to see what is not accepted.
I understand why they might be better deleted, though. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:06, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
- I see a distinction between a legitimate submission that doesn't get accepted, for whatever reason, and promotional material entirely unrelated to the conference. In the former case, I agree with you completely; in the latter case, on the other hand, we're not going to continue hosting it just because it came in via a submission form. Kirill (talk) 12:36, 1 September 2015 (EDT)