Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kirill Lokshin"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I see a distinction between a legitimate submission that doesn't get accepted, for whatever reason, and promotional material entirely unrelated to the conference. In the former case, I agree with you completely; in the latter case, on the other hand, we're not going to continue hosting it just because it came in via a submission form. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]] ([[User talk:Kirill Lokshin|talk]]) 12:36, 1 September 2015 (EDT) |
:I see a distinction between a legitimate submission that doesn't get accepted, for whatever reason, and promotional material entirely unrelated to the conference. In the former case, I agree with you completely; in the latter case, on the other hand, we're not going to continue hosting it just because it came in via a submission form. [[User:Kirill Lokshin|Kirill]] ([[User talk:Kirill Lokshin|talk]]) 12:36, 1 September 2015 (EDT) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==Still Edit?== |
||
+ | I've submitted a proposal for the 2015 conference. While it seems I can still edit it, is that within the scope of expectations? [[User:Tom Lowenhaupt|Tom Lowenhaupt]] ([[User talk:Tom Lowenhaupt|talk]]) 18:08, 1 September 2015 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:08, 1 September 2015
Deletion of out of scope submissions
Must out of scope submissions be deleted? Can they not be just labeled out of scope? I would still like these people to attend the event, and for people to see what is not accepted.
I understand why they might be better deleted, though. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:06, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
- I see a distinction between a legitimate submission that doesn't get accepted, for whatever reason, and promotional material entirely unrelated to the conference. In the former case, I agree with you completely; in the latter case, on the other hand, we're not going to continue hosting it just because it came in via a submission form. Kirill (talk) 12:36, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
Still Edit?
I've submitted a proposal for the 2015 conference. While it seems I can still edit it, is that within the scope of expectations? Tom Lowenhaupt (talk) 18:08, 1 September 2015 (EDT)