Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2015/Disputed Notability - A Hands on Workshop"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Interested attendees: removed null line and added my interest)
Line 33: Line 33:
   
 
# I am excited to hear a presentation from this Wikipedia group. See you at the conference! [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 07:38, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
 
# I am excited to hear a presentation from this Wikipedia group. See you at the conference! [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span>]] 07:38, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
# ''.''
 
 
# [[User:Megs|Megs]] ([[User talk:Megs|talk]]) 13:28, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
 
# [[User:Megs|Megs]] ([[User talk:Megs|talk]]) 13:28, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
 
# [[User:Frankcjones|Frankcjones]] ([[User talk:Frankcjones|talk]]) 23:01, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
 
# [[User:Frankcjones|Frankcjones]] ([[User talk:Frankcjones|talk]]) 23:01, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
  +
# [[User:DocTree|DocTree]] ([[User talk:DocTree|talk]]) 22:46, 3 September 2015 (EDT)
   
 
[[Category:Submissions/2015]]
 
[[Category:Submissions/2015]]

Revision as of 02:46, 4 September 2015

Disputed Notability - A Hands-On Workshop
Community
Workshop
Authors
Kasey Baker and Frank Jones
Email
kayzbaker911@gmail
Usernames
Kayz911 and Frankcjones:
Groups
North Carolina Triangle Wikipedians:
Abstract
Notability, what does it mean within Wikipedia? This is a subject that many of us have wrestled with far too often, yet we are left to our personal threshold for what we establish to be notable.

In our presentation, we will show you just how arbitrary this could be, by presenting a selection of Wikipedia articles, some have been accepted and some have been rejected for lacking notability. Decide for yourself if an article should be accepted or rejected, and then learn the fate of the article and what the community said about it. Together, let’s have a frank discussion whether or not notability standards are being applied fairly, or if we should take a real look into establishing some concrete notability guidelines.

Participants should come away with a keen understanding of this dilemma, how notability is currently defined, and some solutions to improve the standard.:

Time
60 mins
Special schedule requests

None

Will you attend WikiConference USA if your submission is not accepted?
maybe depending on if we get a scholarship or not

Interested attendees

If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).

  1. I am excited to hear a presentation from this Wikipedia group. See you at the conference! Blue Rasberry (talk) 07:38, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
  2. Megs (talk) 13:28, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
  3. Frankcjones (talk) 23:01, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
  4. DocTree (talk) 22:46, 3 September 2015 (EDT)