Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2015/Journalism and the online information community"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 48: Line 48:
# --[[User:Sphilbrick|Sphilbrick]] ([[User talk:Sphilbrick|talk]]) 21:35, 26 August 2015 (EDT)
# --[[User:Sphilbrick|Sphilbrick]] ([[User talk:Sphilbrick|talk]]) 21:35, 26 August 2015 (EDT)
# [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]] ([[User talk:Tokyogirl79|talk]]) 05:43, 9 September 2015 (EDT)
# [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]] ([[User talk:Tokyogirl79|talk]]) 05:43, 9 September 2015 (EDT)
# -[[User:Another Believer|Another Believer]] ([[User talk:Another Believer|talk]]) 11:27, 6 October 2015 (EDT)
# ''Add your username here.''
# ''Add your username here.''

Revision as of 15:27, 6 October 2015

Journalism and the online information community: How Wikimedians cover Wikimedia
Type of submission
Robert Fernandez
E-mail address
Wikipedia Signpost
Wikipedia makes a massive contribution to the world's knowledge and information accessibility. By many metrics, the hundreds of language-Wikipedias and other Wikimedia projects comprise one of the world's largest institutions; yet it is relatively unnoticed by journalists, except when major controversies arise. Mainstream journalism has only scratched the surface of this complex web of websites, projects, and the volunteers and paid staff who run the Wikimedia movement, leaving the job of documenting and explaining its workings to the movement itself. A number of institutions and solo projects devoted to Wikimedia journalism are attempting to fill this gap, raising many interesting questions: such as:
  • How does community journalism differ from professional media coverage of Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects?
  • How does the nature of the community institution affect the coverage it creates?
  • How does the lack of professional journalism training, expertise, and resources affect community journalism?
The panel will discuss approaches to Wikimedia community journalism and the advantages, challenges, and biases of each.


Length of presentation
45-60 min. (60 would be preferred given the size of the panel, but we can work with 45.)
Special schedule requests
We'd like to display PowerPoint slides, but it's not absolutely essential.
Will you attend WikiConference USA if your submission is not accepted?
Other panelists yes, submitter tentative.

Interested attendees

If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).

  1. Slowking4 (talk)
  2. Smallbones (talk)
  3. Rhododendrites (talk) 13:39, 26 August 2015 (EDT)
  4. --Sphilbrick (talk) 21:35, 26 August 2015 (EDT)
  5. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:43, 9 September 2015 (EDT)
  6. -Another Believer (talk) 11:27, 6 October 2015 (EDT)
  7. Add your username here.