Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2016/College Students and Perceptions of Authority in Wikipedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "<!-- Simply provide information about your submission below and save the page. --> ;Title: ;Theme: Education ;Submissions#Academic Peer Re...") |
Imzadi1979 (talk | contribs) (+1) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
'''If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).''' |
'''If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).''' |
||
| + | #02:32, 24 August 2016 (EDT) |
||
# ''Add your username here.'' |
# ''Add your username here.'' |
||
Revision as of 06:32, 24 August 2016
- Title
- Theme
- Education
- Type of submission
- Presentation
- Author
- Lily Todorinova
- E-mail address
- lily.todorinova@rutgers.edu
- Username
- Affiliation
- Rutgers University
- Abstract
- This study considered the implications of using a basic rubric for source evaluation in Wikipedia and its effect on perceptions of the authority and quality of the online encyclopedia. Around sixty students in a large public university in the United States were given a brief survey, which asked them to talk about their considerations for choosing a source for their research papers and whether or not Wikipedia was an acceptable choice. Students were asked to examine an existing article on Internet Privacy in the context of a hypothetical research assignment. Half of the group was provided a source evaluation rubric, which describes basic information literacy source criteria. The students who had the rubric had a higher perception of the authority of Wikipedia than the students who had no guide for evaluating the source. This indicates that while students continue to be warned by their faculty against using Wikipedia for their research papers, they actually find it helpful and appropriate for certain academic purposes. Moreover, students who use a rubric in Wikipedia to evaluate sources seem better able to articulate why a source is useful (or not). This presentation will discuss the results of the study, as well as wider considerations for navigating the use of Wikipedia in the college classroom.
- Length of presentation
- 30 min.
- Special schedule requests
- N/A
- Preferred room size
- 25
- Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?
- Not sure
Interested attendees
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).
- 02:32, 24 August 2016 (EDT)
- Add your username here.