Edit WCNA 2019 Session Submission: Submissions:2019/"Professor, the bookstore has no textbook listed for this course!": Relying on WikiEdu & Wikipedia to Teach Research Methods
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group:
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your
"Professor, the bookstore has no textbook listed for this course!": Relying on WikiEdu & Wikipedia to Teach Research Methods
Reliability of Information
Relationship Building & Support
Inclusion and Diversity
Editor Recruitment & Retention
Tech & Tools
Harassment Civility & Safety
Type of session
Please describe your proposal in at least 300 words.
If you have any relevant webpages, slidedecks, etc., you may link them here.
Relying on Wikipedia in higher education as a source of course assignments, information-seeking, or secondary research is one that is reliable, timely, and valid. However, many students, faculty, and administrators do not initially believe in the utility and authenticity of this practice. This presentation describes the experience of an assistant professor (presenter) using Wikipedia through several human communication courses to provide course assignments and teach students the reliability of using Wikipedia and creating and editing pages. In addition, the presentation will focus on using WikiEdu and Wikipedia in lieu of a traditional textbook in a research methods course with 35 undergraduate students. The experience of the resistance received from other departmental faculty and students enrolled in the course will be discussed and shared with the audience. Ultimately the goal of this presentation is to share the experience of using Wikipedia and WikiEdu to meet the course's student learning outcomes and how these objectives were met and surpassed. Relying on the tenets of inoculation theory and framed using social judgment theory attendees will be provided with a lens for understanding how to best construct counterarguments for explaining to administrators, faculty, and students the justification of using Wikipedia to learn course information, and for the justifications for aiming to produce original and novel student material that is reliable for others access on Wikipedia. The presenter is an expert in the study of lying and deception and focuses his teaching and research on ideas of authenticity, truth, deception and the like - ultimately this perspective on veracity will frame the presentation.
Academic Peer Review option
Select this option if you are making an academic submission that you would like evaluated by a subset of academics serving on the Program Committee. Learn more
To avoid spambots, use
in place of
Affiliated organization(s) (optional)
The organization, company, Wikimedia affiliate, etc. that you are representing, if applicable.
Preferred room size
Have you presented on this topic previously?
If yes, where/when?
If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program?
(e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)
If you are creating a slidedeck for your presentation, please upload it to the
with a free license, and include all suitable attribution in the slidedeck for any images used.
Watch this page
Retrieved from "
Safe space policy
Past and partners
Learn about WikiCred
What links here