Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2019/Getting rid of ''ibid.'': Consolidate and improve citations with Harvard-style referencing, Worldcat, and Citer"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (grammar & c/e)
(Status update)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission
 
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission
  +
|status=Declined
 
|theme=Reliability of Information<br />
 
|theme=Reliability of Information<br />
 
|type=Workshop
 
|type=Workshop
 
|abstract=''Ibid.'' is an abbreviation for ''ibidem'', "in the same place". While it is sometimes used explicitly in Wikipedia, more commonly editors use a ''de facto'' version, which consists of a full citation followed later by shortened citations consisting of an author(s) name(s) and year of publication. These are usually hand-crafted and typically do not use citation templates. This often leads to citations that are inconsistent in format and placement. They also usually fail to link to a source. This is often confusing and not conducive to a good user experience!
 
|abstract=''Ibid.'' is an abbreviation for ''ibidem'', "in the same place". While it is sometimes used explicitly in Wikipedia, more commonly editors use a ''de facto'' version, which consists of a full citation followed later by shortened citations consisting of an author(s) name(s) and year of publication. These are usually hand-crafted and typically do not use citation templates. This often leads to citations that are inconsistent in format and placement. They also usually fail to link to a source. This is often confusing and not conducive to a good user experience!
   
This tutorial will go through the steps to effective use Harvard-style referencing through several steps and many examples.
+
This tutorial will go through the steps to effective use [[:wikipedia:en:Parenthetical referencing|Harvard-style referencing]] through several steps and many examples.
 
#What is Harvard-style referencing and why is it desirable?
 
#What is Harvard-style referencing and why is it desirable?
 
#Creating the '''Sources''' section
 
#Creating the '''Sources''' section
 
#Creating complete and useful book citations
 
#Creating complete and useful book citations
##Using Worldcat
+
##Using [https://www.worldcat.org/ Worldcat]
###Obtaining OCLC numbers to locate items in the nearest library (aligning with Wikipedia's 3rd pillar of providing free content)
+
###Obtaining [[:wikipedia:en:Wikipedia:OCLC|OCLC]] numbers to locate items in the nearest library (aligning with Wikipedia's 3rd pillar of providing free content)
 
###Finding online versions of books, articles, and theses, where availabe
 
###Finding online versions of books, articles, and theses, where availabe
 
###Obtaining additional parameter information, such as edition, volume, issue, original publication date, publication place, publishers, series, ISBN or ISSN numbers, and etc.
 
###Obtaining additional parameter information, such as edition, volume, issue, original publication date, publication place, publishers, series, ISBN or ISSN numbers, and etc.
##Using Citer to generate reference citation templates, citation templates with ref=harv, and shortened foot note (sfn) templates
+
##Using [https://tools.wmflabs.org/citer Citer] to generate reference citation templates, citation templates with ref=harv, and shortened foot note (sfn) templates
 
###Using Citer with URLs, ISBNs, or DOIs
 
###Using Citer with URLs, ISBNs, or DOIs
 
####What Citer generates for the ref parameter without an author
 
####What Citer generates for the ref parameter without an author
Line 23: Line 24:
 
##Placing full citations in the Source section
 
##Placing full citations in the Source section
 
##Using the shortened footnote templates: <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[:wikipedia:en:template:sfn|sfn]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[:wikipedia:en:template:harvnb|harbnb]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[:wikipedia:en:template:harv|harv]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>
 
##Using the shortened footnote templates: <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[:wikipedia:en:template:sfn|sfn]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[:wikipedia:en:template:harvnb|harbnb]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[:wikipedia:en:template:harv|harv]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki>
##Using shortened footnote templates to refer to specific pages
+
##Using shortened footnote templates to refer to a specific page or pages within a work
 
|academic=No
 
|academic=No
 
|author=Raymond Leonard
 
|author=Raymond Leonard
Line 29: Line 30:
 
|username=Peaceray
 
|username=Peaceray
 
|affiliates=Cascadia Wikimedians
 
|affiliates=Cascadia Wikimedians
|time=One hour minimum
+
|time=One hour minimum; prefer longer if possible.
 
|size=Two dozen give or take; I am comfortable with right-sizing the room to the projected attendance.
 
|size=Two dozen give or take; I am comfortable with right-sizing the room to the projected attendance.
 
|requests=projector & screen; tables so attendees can edit & take notes
 
|requests=projector & screen; tables so attendees can edit & take notes

Latest revision as of 20:04, 13 October 2019

Due to limited space, WikiConference North America 2019 unfortunately could not accommodate this submission in its program this year.
Please check out our Unconference for opportunities to present and share there.



Title:

Getting rid of ''ibid.'': Consolidate and improve citations with Harvard-style referencing, Worldcat, and Citer

Theme:

Reliability of Information

Type of session:

Workshop

Abstract:

Ibid. is an abbreviation for ibidem, "in the same place". While it is sometimes used explicitly in Wikipedia, more commonly editors use a de facto version, which consists of a full citation followed later by shortened citations consisting of an author(s) name(s) and year of publication. These are usually hand-crafted and typically do not use citation templates. This often leads to citations that are inconsistent in format and placement. They also usually fail to link to a source. This is often confusing and not conducive to a good user experience!

This tutorial will go through the steps to effective use Harvard-style referencing through several steps and many examples.

  1. What is Harvard-style referencing and why is it desirable?
  2. Creating the Sources section
  3. Creating complete and useful book citations
    1. Using Worldcat
      1. Obtaining OCLC numbers to locate items in the nearest library (aligning with Wikipedia's 3rd pillar of providing free content)
      2. Finding online versions of books, articles, and theses, where availabe
      3. Obtaining additional parameter information, such as edition, volume, issue, original publication date, publication place, publishers, series, ISBN or ISSN numbers, and etc.
    2. Using Citer to generate reference citation templates, citation templates with ref=harv, and shortened foot note (sfn) templates
      1. Using Citer with URLs, ISBNs, or DOIs
        1. What Citer generates for the ref parameter without an author
        2. Obstacles with using web.archive.org with Citer
      2. Using Citer with OCLC numbers
    3. Handcrafting special citation templates or altering citation templates generated by Citer
      1. {{cite thesis}}
      2. Correcting templates generated by Citer using a OCLC number
  4. Putting it all together
    1. Placing full citations in the Source section
    2. Using the shortened footnote templates: {{sfn}}, {{harbnb}}, {{harv}}
    3. Using shortened footnote templates to refer to a specific page or pages within a work

Academic Peer Review option:

No

Author name:

Raymond Leonard

E-mail address:

raymond.f.leonard.jr@gmail.com

Wikimedia username:

Peaceray

Affiliated organization(s):

Cascadia Wikimedians

Estimated time:

One hour minimum; prefer longer if possible.

Preferred room size:

Two dozen give or take; I am comfortable with right-sizing the room to the projected attendance.

Special requests:

projector & screen; tables so attendees can edit & take notes

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:

I have presented on citations before at Wikiconference NA '15 & '16, but not in depth on Harvard-style referencing

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

Yes, but I do not think it will be as nearly as effective without the requisite time.