Submissions:2019/How articles start

From WikiConference North America
Revision as of 02:42, 23 September 2019 by DGG (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission |theme=Reliability of Information<br /> |type=Workshop |abstract=It is only practical to improve the quality and maintain the currency of our mi...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This submission has been noted and is pending review for WikiConference North America 2019.



Title:

How articles start

Theme:

Reliability of Information

Type of session:

Workshop

Abstract:

It is only practical to improve the quality and maintain the currency of our millions of articles if they are reasonably acceptable at the start. For the last 12 years, my principal activity on Wikipedia has been the various processes of screening new articles. I will describe and illustrate not just what it is supposed to be, but how it actually works. I'm going to give some indication of how it has evolved, some illustrations of the process in action, and an indication of what I look for when I do it. I'll emphasise our most recently added process, Articles for Creation.

1. Userspace drafts 2. Articles for Creation / Draftspace 3. New pages patrol 4. Speedy Deletion and other deletion processes.

Academic Peer Review option:

No

Author name:

David Goodman

E-mail address:

dgoodmanny@aol.com

Wikimedia username:

DGG

Affiliated organization(s):

Wikimedia-NYC

Estimated time:

60 min

Preferred room size:

30

Special requests:

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:

no

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

yes