View source for Submissions:2019/Quality vs Usefulness: Can we have more FAs on vital topics?

{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission
|status=Lightning
|theme=Reliability of Information<br />+ Other
|type=Lightning Talk
|abstract=Is there  a trend that numerous high-quality articles are written about very specialized topics (e.g. a specific battle or historical biography), while general articles that are useful to a wide audience (e.g. "vital" articles) does not get as much quality? A quick look based on comparing FA/GA status and view count statistics indicates some evidence for this, at least for recent years.

Relevant links: 
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:ENFA
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:ENGA
|academic=No
|author=HaEr48
|email=Use "Email this user" function
|username=HaEr48
|time=5 mins
|present-other=only enough content here for a short (lightning talk) session
}}