Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2019/Wikispore: Wider than Wikipedia, Deeper than Wikidata"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(Allocated time for lightning talk)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission
 
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission
  +
|status=Lightning
 
|theme=Reliability of Information<br />+ Relationship Building & Support<br />+ Inclusion and Diversity<br />+ Tech & Tools<br />
 
|theme=Reliability of Information<br />+ Relationship Building & Support<br />+ Inclusion and Diversity<br />+ Tech & Tools<br />
 
|type=Presentation
 
|type=Presentation
 
|abstract=The Wikimedia movement supports wikis such as Wikipedia and Commons which were groundbreaking in the early 2000s, but hasn't had a new sister project since the launch of Wikivoyage and Wikidata in 2012. With time, the limitations of Wikipedia's scope and nature as a tertiary source have become clearer, and at the same time Wikidata has opened up the vista of many more discernible topics without narrative pages. Our movement needs to experiment again, and to open up new genres of free knowledge.
 
|abstract=The Wikimedia movement supports wikis such as Wikipedia and Commons which were groundbreaking in the early 2000s, but hasn't had a new sister project since the launch of Wikivoyage and Wikidata in 2012. With time, the limitations of Wikipedia's scope and nature as a tertiary source have become clearer, and at the same time Wikidata has opened up the vista of many more discernible topics without narrative pages. Our movement needs to experiment again, and to open up new genres of free knowledge.
   
Proposals for new Wikimedia projects have been diverse and lively for years, often gathering hundreds of supporters, but without an effective outlet they have withered on the vine. The paradigm of an all-or-nothing launch and the legacy of projects of limited success such as Wikinews has driven a short-sighted conservatism that can and should be broken. New prospects are possible, such as wikis on current events, the art world, genealogy, and many topics that can benefit from novel approaches to a diversity of written and oral sources within a given domain.
+
[[meta:Proposals for new projects|Proposals for new Wikimedia projects]] have been diverse and lively for years, sometimes gathering hundreds of supporters, but without an effective outlet they have withered on the vine. The paradigm of an all-or-nothing launch and the legacy of projects of limited success such as Wikinews has driven a short-sighted conservatism that can and should be broken. New prospects are possible, such as wikis on current events, the art world, genealogy, community histories, and many topics that can benefit from novel approaches to a diversity of written and oral sources within a given domain.
   
 
This idea of a reversion to the protean phase grew up out of the [[w:Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wiknic 2019|New York City Strategy Wiki-Picnic]] on Roosevelt Island in the summer of 2019, as discussions around both partnerships and diversity converged in a need for greater flexibility and the starting of new "spore" mini-projects to support new directions for the movement. It subsequently took greater shape at the Wikimania hackathon in Stockholm, as the project was able to find a temporary home on Wikimedia Cloud Services.
 
This idea of a reversion to the protean phase grew up out of the [[w:Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wiknic 2019|New York City Strategy Wiki-Picnic]] on Roosevelt Island in the summer of 2019, as discussions around both partnerships and diversity converged in a need for greater flexibility and the starting of new "spore" mini-projects to support new directions for the movement. It subsequently took greater shape at the Wikimania hackathon in Stockholm, as the project was able to find a temporary home on Wikimedia Cloud Services.

Latest revision as of 07:22, 11 October 2019

This submission has been designated as a lightning talk at WikiConference North America 2019.



Title:

Wikispore: Wider than Wikipedia, Deeper than Wikidata

Theme:

Reliability of Information
+ Relationship Building & Support
+ Inclusion and Diversity
+ Tech & Tools

Type of session:

Presentation

Abstract:

The Wikimedia movement supports wikis such as Wikipedia and Commons which were groundbreaking in the early 2000s, but hasn't had a new sister project since the launch of Wikivoyage and Wikidata in 2012. With time, the limitations of Wikipedia's scope and nature as a tertiary source have become clearer, and at the same time Wikidata has opened up the vista of many more discernible topics without narrative pages. Our movement needs to experiment again, and to open up new genres of free knowledge.

Proposals for new Wikimedia projects have been diverse and lively for years, sometimes gathering hundreds of supporters, but without an effective outlet they have withered on the vine. The paradigm of an all-or-nothing launch and the legacy of projects of limited success such as Wikinews has driven a short-sighted conservatism that can and should be broken. New prospects are possible, such as wikis on current events, the art world, genealogy, community histories, and many topics that can benefit from novel approaches to a diversity of written and oral sources within a given domain.

This idea of a reversion to the protean phase grew up out of the New York City Strategy Wiki-Picnic on Roosevelt Island in the summer of 2019, as discussions around both partnerships and diversity converged in a need for greater flexibility and the starting of new "spore" mini-projects to support new directions for the movement. It subsequently took greater shape at the Wikimania hackathon in Stockholm, as the project was able to find a temporary home on Wikimedia Cloud Services.

We will explore both the social and technical aspects of "germinating" new wikis with Wikispore. Here the wiki farm is reconceptualized as an agricultural experiment where genre concepts are allowed to succeed or fail on their merits, with perhaps the top 10 test wikis selected each year for interim development in a manner similar to the Community Wishlist Survey, and, after a maturation phase, one or two might sprout yearly to full sister project.

We will follow the technical details of building a decentralized wiki farm where it is possible to experiment and innovate on one wiki without risking the stability of the other wikis, and on ways to build deep integration with Wikipedia and Wikidata so that content on Wikispore is discoverable and usable inside the Wikimedia ecosystem, to a degree far greater than that available on third-party specialized wikis.

Academic Peer Review option:

No

Author name:

Richard Knipel and Gergő Tisza

E-mail address:

pharosofalexandria@gmail.com

Wikimedia username:

Pharos and Tgr

Affiliated organization(s):

Estimated time:

30 minutes

Preferred room size:

Large room

Special requests:

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:

no

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

yes