Edit WCNA 2021 Session Submission: Submissions:2021/Edit-a-thons in the time of COVID: Lessons learned during 18 months of online editing events

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

Submission for Edit-a-thons in the time of COVID: Lessons learned during 18 months of online editing events

Theme
Global & Local Relationship Building & Support Inclusion & Diversity Depth & Breadth for Newer Editors Tech & Tools Harassment Civility & Safety Other

Type of session

Abstract
Please describe your proposal in at least 300 words.
If you have any relevant webpages, slidedecks, etc., you may link them here.

At the start of the pandemic, the fate of in-person edit-a-thons was in question. Live, in-person edit-a-thons are often attended by inexperienced editors who tend to require on-demand support as well as staff from institutional partners or organizations looking for guidance on acceptable ways to incorporate their knowledge and collections into Wikipedia without violating the conflict of interest policy. Initially, it seemed that the same level of social interaction, editor assistance, and content creation would be impossible to achieve in a virtual environment. It is now evident that successful virtual edit-a-thons are possible. Furthermore, it is quite likely that a hybrid edit-a-thon model consisting of both in-person and virtual events may be the best way forward as it could possibly result in increased both editor and content diversity.

Since March of 2020, Wikimedia DC has helped to facilitate over 45 virtual Wikipedia edit-a-thons. Institutional partners for these events have included The White House Gender Policy Council, The National Museum of Women in the Arts, and the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Adapting the in-person edit-a-thon model to a virtual one presented a variety of challenges. These challenges included: 1) generating buy-in from institutional partners while they, too, were re-evaluating their own capacities, 2) managing online conferencing platforms across audiences with varying experience levels, and 3) training new editors while not being able to provide the traditional means of support. After nearly a year-and-a-half of online edit-a-thons, we have found that with proper planning and flexibility, the success of the in-person edit-a-thon can be replicated, and possibly even enhanced, online.

During this session, Ariel Cetrone, Wikimedia DC's Institutional Partnerships Manager, will share lessons learned as well as best practices for both maintaining effective partnerships and engaging audiences during virtual edit-a-thons as well as a vision for the future of virtual editing events.

Academic Peer Review option
Select this option if you are making an academic submission that you would like evaluated by a subset of academics serving on the Program Committee. Learn more here.

Author name

E-mail address
To avoid spambots, use {{@}} in place of @

Wikimedia username

Affiliated organization(s) (optional)
The organization, company, Wikimedia affiliate, etc. that you are representing, if applicable.

Estimated time

Special requests

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

Submit for review or draft?
Select whether you are ready to submit this proposal for review, or would like to have it marked as a draft for you to continue working on it.
Submit Draft

If you are creating a slide deck for your presentation, please upload it to the Wikimedia Commons with a free license, and include all suitable attribution in the slide deck for any images used.

Watch this page

Edit WCNA 2021 Session Submission: Submissions:2021/Edit-a-thons in the time of COVID: Lessons learned during 18 months of online editing events

Navigation menu

Search