Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2021/Expert fact-checkers rely on Wikipedia. You and your students should too!"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{WCNA 2021 Session Submission |theme=Tech & Tools, Other |type=Workshop |abstract=The past two years have been difficult for students and faculty alike, as we have had to gra...")
 
(Accepted)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|theme=Tech & Tools, Other
 
|theme=Tech & Tools, Other
 
|type=Workshop
 
|type=Workshop
|abstract=The past two years have been difficult for students and faculty alike, as we have had to grapple simultaneously with the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and an information infodemic, defined as “an overabundance of information—some accurate and some not—that makes it hard for people to find trustworthy sources and reliable guidance when they need it” (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pd). As social media platforms and fact-checking organizations have struggled to keep up with vetting COVID-19 related information (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/technology/coronavirus-misinformation-social-media.html; https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2020/04/15/coronavirus-misinformation-snopes/), it has become urgent for all of us to learn effective strategies for deciding whether online information can be trusted.
+
|abstract=In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, students and faculty alike are also grappling with an "infodemic." The World Health Organization defines an "infodemic" as “an overabundance of information—some accurate and some not—that makes it hard for people to find trustworthy sources and reliable guidance when they need it” ([https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200202-sitrep-13-ncov-v3.pd World Health Organization, 2020]). Social media platforms and fact-checking organizations are also struggling to keep up with vetting information about the pandemic ([https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/08/technology/coronavirus-misinformation-social-media.html Frenkel et al., 2020]; [https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2020/04/15/coronavirus-misinformation-snopes/ Izadi, 2020]).
 
Wikipedia can play an important role in helping students quickly determine if sources of information are trustworthy. For example, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) website appears to be a trustworthy source of information about vaccines; however, a quick search in Wikipedia reveals that the NVIC is an anti-vaccination advocacy group. In fact, professional fact-checkers often turn to Wikipedia as a starting point to investigate the potential biases or agenda of a source (https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=22806).
 
   
  +
In the context of the "infodemic," it is critical to teach our students strategies for deciding whether online information can be trusted. Using Wikipedia to check the potential agenda or biases of a source can help students quickly determine if that source is trustworthy. This approach is both more efficient and effective than scrutinizing the original information for clues about its credibility. In fact, professional fact-checkers often turn to Wikipedia as a starting point to investigate sources ([https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=22806 Wineburg & McGrew, 2019]).
Over the past several years, we have partnered with colleagues teaching civics to first-year college students at the College of Staten Island, CUNY. As one of 11 institutions participating in the Digital Polarization Initiative (https://www.aascu.org/AcademicAffairs/ADP/DigiPo/), sponsored by the American Association of State Colleges and Universities, we have aimed to teach college students how to use lateral reading strategies to vet online information. Lateral reading involves leaving a website to investigate the people and organizations promoting the online content, finding out what other sources have to say about it, and tracing the content back to its original source. Using Wikipedia to investigate sources contradicts what many students have been taught in school. However, we have found that students are receptive to using Wikipedia to investigate sources and make gains in their ability and confidence to vet online information (https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-021-00291-4; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23328584211038937).
 
  +
 
Our institution, the College of Staten Island, CUNY, is one of 11 institutions participating in the [https://www.aascu.org/AcademicAffairs/ADP/DigiPo/ Digital Polarization Initiative], sponsored by the American Association of State Colleges and Universities. We have partnered with instructors of the college's civics course to teach first-year college students how to read laterally when vetting online information. Lateral reading involves leaving a website to investigate the people and organizations promoting the online content, finding out what other sources have to say about it, and tracing the content back to its original source. Using Wikipedia to investigate sources may be counter to what many students were taught prior to college or in other college classes. However, students are receptive to using Wikipedia to investigate sources and improve in both their ability and confidence to read laterally ([https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-021-00291-4 Brodsky et al., 2021a], [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/23328584211038937 2021b]).
   
 
In this workshop, we will share findings from the Digital Polarization Initiative and help you build activities for your own courses that teach students to use Wikipedia when fact-checking online information.
 
In this workshop, we will share findings from the Digital Polarization Initiative and help you build activities for your own courses that teach students to use Wikipedia when fact-checking online information.
 
|academic=No
 
|academic=No
|author=Jessica E. Brodsky
+
|author=Jessica E. Brodsky and Patricia J. Brooks
 
|email=jbrodsky1{{@}}gradcenter.cuny.edu and patricia.brooks{{@}}csi.cuny.edu
|author=Patricia J. Brooks
 
 
|username=Jeb245 and Brooks_patty
|email=jbrodsky1{{@}}gradcenter.cuny.edu
 
|email=patricia.brooks{{@}}csi.cuny.edu
 
|username=Jeb245
 
|username=Brooks_patty
 
 
|affiliates=The College of Staten Island, CUNY
 
|affiliates=The College of Staten Island, CUNY
 
|time=45 minutes
 
|time=45 minutes
Line 21: Line 18:
 
|presented=No
 
|presented=No
 
|present-other=Presentation
 
|present-other=Presentation
|status=Submit
+
|status=Accepted
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 22:27, 28 September 2021

This submission has been accepted for WikiConference North America 2021.



Title:

Expert fact-checkers rely on Wikipedia. You and your students should too!

Theme:

Tech & Tools, Other

Type of session:

Workshop

Abstract:

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, students and faculty alike are also grappling with an "infodemic." The World Health Organization defines an "infodemic" as “an overabundance of information—some accurate and some not—that makes it hard for people to find trustworthy sources and reliable guidance when they need it” (World Health Organization, 2020). Social media platforms and fact-checking organizations are also struggling to keep up with vetting information about the pandemic (Frenkel et al., 2020; Izadi, 2020).

In the context of the "infodemic," it is critical to teach our students strategies for deciding whether online information can be trusted. Using Wikipedia to check the potential agenda or biases of a source can help students quickly determine if that source is trustworthy. This approach is both more efficient and effective than scrutinizing the original information for clues about its credibility. In fact, professional fact-checkers often turn to Wikipedia as a starting point to investigate sources (Wineburg & McGrew, 2019).

Our institution, the College of Staten Island, CUNY, is one of 11 institutions participating in the Digital Polarization Initiative, sponsored by the American Association of State Colleges and Universities. We have partnered with instructors of the college's civics course to teach first-year college students how to read laterally when vetting online information. Lateral reading involves leaving a website to investigate the people and organizations promoting the online content, finding out what other sources have to say about it, and tracing the content back to its original source. Using Wikipedia to investigate sources may be counter to what many students were taught prior to college or in other college classes. However, students are receptive to using Wikipedia to investigate sources and improve in both their ability and confidence to read laterally (Brodsky et al., 2021a, 2021b).

In this workshop, we will share findings from the Digital Polarization Initiative and help you build activities for your own courses that teach students to use Wikipedia when fact-checking online information.

Academic Peer Review option:

No

Author name:

Jessica E. Brodsky and Patricia J. Brooks

E-mail address:

jbrodsky1@gradcenter.cuny.edu and patricia.brooks@csi.cuny.edu

Wikimedia username:

Jeb245 and Brooks_patty

Affiliated organization(s):

The College of Staten Island, CUNY

Estimated time:

45 minutes

Special requests:

None

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:

No

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

Presentation