Difference between revisions of "User:Econterms/Draft report on WCNA 2021"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(rearranged charts)
(details)
Line 1: Line 1:
* '''Objectives''': We committed ourselves early in a series of weekly meetings to (a) making the event inclusive, notably by arranging captions or audio interpretation across languages, which would be new to the WCNA conferences; (b) a theme of global-and-local frames implemented in several ways; (c) supporting local events and being able to sponsor attendees who needed funding to make time or get equipment to attend.
 
* '''English/Spanish interpretation''': It went well overall. The systems are complicated. Show diagram?
 
* '''Technologies, suppliers, and platforms''': Hopin, Kudo, Tlatolli mainly. The effort to scale up to over 200 registrants and English/Spanish interpretation raised our costs over other conferences and
 
   
  +
[[File:WCNA 2021 attendance times chart easterntime from Hopin.png|thumb|right|Figure 1: Attendance on Hopin in eastern time]]
* '''Attendance''': See charts below (may not be able to replicate these on meta, depending on copyright stuff, but we can cite them). Overall over 300 registered, but this includes a number of duplicates and people who could not or did not actually attend. 186 logged in to our Hopin event at some point. The peak attendance at one time was 92 people, early on Friday afternoon, possibly when Carmen was giving her invited talk. In the first chart, attendance never drops near zero even at night because there was no need to log out. On Thursday evening we invited attendees for a social/test time on the platform.
 
 
[[File:WCNA 2021 attendance table 2 from Hopin.png|thumb|right|Attendance and chat activity by virtual room]]
<gallery mode="packed-overlay" heights="120">
 
File:WCNA 2021 attendance times chart easterntime from Hopin.png|Figure 1: Attendance on Hopin in eastern time
+
[[File:WCNA 2021 attendance table 3 from Hopin.png|thumb|right|Registrants by country (from email addresses? or IP addresses?)]]
  +
File:WCNA 2021 attendance table 2 from Hopin.png|Attendance and chat activity by virtual room
 
 
* '''Objectives''': We committed ourselves early in a series of weekly meetings to (a) making the event inclusive, notably by arranging captions or audio interpretation across languages, which would be new to the WCNA conferences; (b) a theme of global-and-local frames implemented in several ways; (c) supporting local events and being able to sponsor attendees who needed funding to make time or get equipment to attend.
File:WCNA 2021 attendance table 3 from Hopin.png|Registrants by country (from email?)
 
  +
* '''English/Spanish interpretation''': It went well overall. The systems are complicated. Show diagram. Interpretation services were offered in the large presentation rooms, which we called Stage Red and Stage Blue, but not in the "breakout rooms" for workshops, editathons, unconference discussions, or lightning talks.
</gallery>
 
 
* '''Technologies, suppliers, and platforms''': Hopin, Kudo, Tlatolli mainly. The effort to scale up to over 200 registrants and English/Spanish interpretation raised our costs over other conferences. We made decisions late in the process to scale up, getting Hopin's "business plan" (which lasts a year and includes some support), and the high-end Kudo software service to integrate interpreters. These raised costs but it was not clear we could succeed with smaller-scale, lower-end components.
* '''Local events''': On Sundary afternoon NYC picnic (photos) and Mexico City. A parallel picnic was held in San Diego.
 
 
* '''Attendance''': See Figures 1-3. (''We may not be able to replicate these on meta, depending on copyright stuff, but we can cite them.'') Overall over 300 registered, but this includes a number of duplicates and people who could not or did not actually attend. 186 logged in to our Hopin event at some point. The peak attendance at one time was 92 people, early on Friday afternoon, possibly when Carmen was giving her invited talk. In the first chart, attendance never drops near zero even at night because there was no need to log out. On Thursday evening we invited attendees for a social/test time on the platform.
* '''Budget''': Our original budget was set by a grant (link). Our actual expenses varied from this (exceeding the budget by perhaps 15-20%). We had small unexpected revenues from selling t-shirts and mugs with the WCNA 2021 logo.
 
  +
Three editathon events linked from the conference program were held on Zoom. These gathered perhaps 20 participants overall, most of whom were also conference attendees.
  +
* '''Local events''': We had in-person events on Sunday afternoon in various locations. NYC picnic (photos) and Mexico City, funded by the grant. A parallel picnic was held in San Diego. Our grant anticipated having more local events. There was less interest than anticipated, and we did not push the point; there was interest in the online event, and caution about the ongoing covid pandemic.
 
* '''Budget''': Our original budget was set by a grant (link). Our actual expenses varied from this, exceeding the budget by perhaps 15-20%. We had small unexpected revenues from selling t-shirts and mugs with the WCNA 2021 logo.

Revision as of 22:57, 12 October 2021

Figure 1: Attendance on Hopin in eastern time
Attendance and chat activity by virtual room
Registrants by country (from email addresses? or IP addresses?)
  • Objectives: We committed ourselves early in a series of weekly meetings to (a) making the event inclusive, notably by arranging captions or audio interpretation across languages, which would be new to the WCNA conferences; (b) a theme of global-and-local frames implemented in several ways; (c) supporting local events and being able to sponsor attendees who needed funding to make time or get equipment to attend.
  • English/Spanish interpretation: It went well overall. The systems are complicated. Show diagram. Interpretation services were offered in the large presentation rooms, which we called Stage Red and Stage Blue, but not in the "breakout rooms" for workshops, editathons, unconference discussions, or lightning talks.
  • Technologies, suppliers, and platforms: Hopin, Kudo, Tlatolli mainly. The effort to scale up to over 200 registrants and English/Spanish interpretation raised our costs over other conferences. We made decisions late in the process to scale up, getting Hopin's "business plan" (which lasts a year and includes some support), and the high-end Kudo software service to integrate interpreters. These raised costs but it was not clear we could succeed with smaller-scale, lower-end components.
  • Attendance: See Figures 1-3. (We may not be able to replicate these on meta, depending on copyright stuff, but we can cite them.) Overall over 300 registered, but this includes a number of duplicates and people who could not or did not actually attend. 186 logged in to our Hopin event at some point. The peak attendance at one time was 92 people, early on Friday afternoon, possibly when Carmen was giving her invited talk. In the first chart, attendance never drops near zero even at night because there was no need to log out. On Thursday evening we invited attendees for a social/test time on the platform.

Three editathon events linked from the conference program were held on Zoom. These gathered perhaps 20 participants overall, most of whom were also conference attendees.

  • Local events: We had in-person events on Sunday afternoon in various locations. NYC picnic (photos) and Mexico City, funded by the grant. A parallel picnic was held in San Diego. Our grant anticipated having more local events. There was less interest than anticipated, and we did not push the point; there was interest in the online event, and caution about the ongoing covid pandemic.
  • Budget: Our original budget was set by a grant (link). Our actual expenses varied from this, exceeding the budget by perhaps 15-20%. We had small unexpected revenues from selling t-shirts and mugs with the WCNA 2021 logo.