Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2015/Women... it takes a village"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(+) |
(c/e) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
;Abstract: |
;Abstract: |
||
| − | + | According to WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force/Media_and_research 84.5%] of the biographies on the en-Wikipedia are about men. The omission of articles about women, sometimes referred to as systemic bias, is correctable. But the issue needs a bright light focused on it and a village committed to change. |
|
| − | WikiProject Women in Red (WiR) was created to address content gender gap... a form of systemic bias. WiR was launched in July at Wikimania 2015 in Mexico City, Mexico by Roger Bamkin (user:Victuallers) and me (Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, user:Rosiestep). WiR's scope focuses on increasing the number of women's biographies from 15% to a larger percentage of Wikipedia's biographies. WiR also seeks to increase the number of articles about women's works, broadly construed, to include the books women wrote, the art they created, the conferences they organized, and so on. WiR maintains lists of crowd-sourced redlinks organized by occupation, nationality, and such. It provides curated groups of redlinked articles to work on through a collaboration with other women's WikiProjects, such as Women artists, Women scientists, and Women writers. It encourages translation from other language Wikipedias through a collaboration with WikiProject Intertranswiki. It streams a Wikidata feed of articles (Wikidata entries with no en-Wikipedia article) through a collaboration with WikiProject X. WiR's members update a list of newly created articles. WiR tracks events and published articles related to the project's scope. |
+ | WikiProject Women in Red (WiR) was created to address content gender gap... a form of systemic bias. WiR was launched in July at Wikimania 2015 in Mexico City, Mexico by Roger Bamkin (user:Victuallers) and me (Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, user:Rosiestep). WiR's scope focuses on increasing the number of women's biographies from 15% to a larger percentage of Wikipedia's biographies. WiR also seeks to increase the number of articles about women's works, broadly construed, to include the books women wrote, the art they created, the conferences they organized, and so on. WiR maintains lists of crowd-sourced redlinks organized by occupation, nationality, and such. It provides curated groups of redlinked articles to work on through a collaboration with other women's WikiProjects, such as Women artists, Women scientists, and Women writers. It encourages translation from other language Wikipedias through a collaboration with WikiProject Intertranswiki. It streams a Wikidata feed of articles (Wikidata entries with no en-Wikipedia article) through a collaboration with WikiProject X. WiR's members update a list of newly created articles. WiR tracks events and published articles related to the project's scope. WiR is young and strong. In its first 24 hours, it dealt with a rename (from WikiProject XX). In its first 2 weeks, the project created almost 500 new articles. In its first month, it encountered a formal merge proposal to become a subgroup of the newly-established, WikiProject Women. |
| − | |||
| − | WiR has had its share of struggles. In its first 24 hours, it was renamed (from WikiProject XX). In its first 30 days, after having created hundreds of new biographies, it encountered a formal merge proposal to become a subgroup of the newly-established, WikiProject Women. WiR has weathered struggles, it has created hundreds of articles, but now it needs a village -- the entire Wikimedia village -- to join the cause. |
||
The objectives of this presentation include: |
The objectives of this presentation include: |
||
| − | *Review WiR's scope |
+ | *Review WiR's scope: women's biographies and women's works. |
| − | *Review lessons learned during the project's first 90 days to include, project design, branding, organization, talkpage issues, collaboration with other WikiProjects, and |
+ | *Review lessons learned during the project's first 90 days to include, project design, branding, organization, talkpage issues, collaboration with other WikiProjects, and membership |
*Provide an outcomes projection for WiR's one year mark |
*Provide an outcomes projection for WiR's one year mark |
||
| + | *Request the community's support in developing a campaign to further our work. We are hopeful that a village-wide campaign will catapult WiR, addressing strategy, developing best practices, and amplifying communication. |
||
| − | *Call for action to the Wikimedia village |
||
It takes a village: |
It takes a village: |
||
| − | *In order to reach its |
+ | * In order to reach its goal of increasing the number of women's biographies, WiR believes we need a global campaign involving the Wikimedia village -- not just en-Wikipedia, but all language Wikipedias, as well as WikiData and Commons. |
| + | * The campaign needs the right title; Wikimedians: name it! |
||
| − | |||
| − | * |
+ | * Examples of campaigns which WiR would like to emulate include Wiki Loves Monuments and ArtAndFeminism. |
| − | * GLAM, Education, Chapters, and User Groups: WiR would benefit from the ideas, the connections, and the support of |
+ | * GLAM, Education, Chapters, and User Groups: WiR would benefit from the ideas, the connections, and the support of these various communities. How can we partner with you? |
* Tech support: WiR's talkpage abounds with discussions centered on tech issues. The WiR tech Wish List is long. WiR needs a technical coordinator. |
* Tech support: WiR's talkpage abounds with discussions centered on tech issues. The WiR tech Wish List is long. WiR needs a technical coordinator. |
||
| + | * WiR needs local and global advocacy, branding, and promotion. It needs internal and external branding, promotion, marking coordination. Editors choose what they edit. If they don't know about a particular initiative, or don't understand that Wikipedia considers it to be a high priority, they won't give it significant attention. Other important components are press coverage and social media expertise. This campaign needs to be not only informational but inspirational as today's readers are tomorrow's editors. |
||
| − | * WiR needs local and global advocacy, branding, and promotion: |
||
| − | :* Editors. Editors choose what they edit. If they don't know about the campaign, or don't understand that Wikipedia considers it to be a high priority, they won't give it enough attention. WiR needs an internal branding and promotion coordinator. |
||
| − | :* Outreach: WiR needs promotion and advocacy through the press and social media. WiR needs a marketing coordinator. This effort needs to be not only informational but inspirational as today's readers are tomorrow's editors. |
||
Join in the conversation at WikiConference USA and/or at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Women_in_Red Women in Red]. |
Join in the conversation at WikiConference USA and/or at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Women_in_Red Women in Red]. |
||
Revision as of 03:36, 21 August 2015
- Title
- Women... it takes a village
- Theme
- Advocacy & Outreach
- Type of submission
- Presentation
- Author
- Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight
- E-mail address
- rosiestep.wiki@gmail.com
- Username
- Rosiestep
- Affiliation
- Wikipedia; WikiWomen's User Group
- Abstract
According to WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Gender gap task force, 84.5% of the biographies on the en-Wikipedia are about men. The omission of articles about women, sometimes referred to as systemic bias, is correctable. But the issue needs a bright light focused on it and a village committed to change.
WikiProject Women in Red (WiR) was created to address content gender gap... a form of systemic bias. WiR was launched in July at Wikimania 2015 in Mexico City, Mexico by Roger Bamkin (user:Victuallers) and me (Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, user:Rosiestep). WiR's scope focuses on increasing the number of women's biographies from 15% to a larger percentage of Wikipedia's biographies. WiR also seeks to increase the number of articles about women's works, broadly construed, to include the books women wrote, the art they created, the conferences they organized, and so on. WiR maintains lists of crowd-sourced redlinks organized by occupation, nationality, and such. It provides curated groups of redlinked articles to work on through a collaboration with other women's WikiProjects, such as Women artists, Women scientists, and Women writers. It encourages translation from other language Wikipedias through a collaboration with WikiProject Intertranswiki. It streams a Wikidata feed of articles (Wikidata entries with no en-Wikipedia article) through a collaboration with WikiProject X. WiR's members update a list of newly created articles. WiR tracks events and published articles related to the project's scope. WiR is young and strong. In its first 24 hours, it dealt with a rename (from WikiProject XX). In its first 2 weeks, the project created almost 500 new articles. In its first month, it encountered a formal merge proposal to become a subgroup of the newly-established, WikiProject Women.
The objectives of this presentation include:
- Review WiR's scope: women's biographies and women's works.
- Review lessons learned during the project's first 90 days to include, project design, branding, organization, talkpage issues, collaboration with other WikiProjects, and membership
- Provide an outcomes projection for WiR's one year mark
- Request the community's support in developing a campaign to further our work. We are hopeful that a village-wide campaign will catapult WiR, addressing strategy, developing best practices, and amplifying communication.
It takes a village:
- In order to reach its goal of increasing the number of women's biographies, WiR believes we need a global campaign involving the Wikimedia village -- not just en-Wikipedia, but all language Wikipedias, as well as WikiData and Commons.
- The campaign needs the right title; Wikimedians: name it!
- Examples of campaigns which WiR would like to emulate include Wiki Loves Monuments and ArtAndFeminism.
- GLAM, Education, Chapters, and User Groups: WiR would benefit from the ideas, the connections, and the support of these various communities. How can we partner with you?
- Tech support: WiR's talkpage abounds with discussions centered on tech issues. The WiR tech Wish List is long. WiR needs a technical coordinator.
- WiR needs local and global advocacy, branding, and promotion. It needs internal and external branding, promotion, marking coordination. Editors choose what they edit. If they don't know about a particular initiative, or don't understand that Wikipedia considers it to be a high priority, they won't give it significant attention. Other important components are press coverage and social media expertise. This campaign needs to be not only informational but inspirational as today's readers are tomorrow's editors.
Join in the conversation at WikiConference USA and/or at Women in Red.
- Length of presentation
- 15 or 30 minutes (30 minutes will allow for interaction with the attendees).
- Special schedule requests
- None
- Will you attend WikiConference USA if your submission is not accepted?
- Yes
Interested attendees
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).
- Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:03, 20 August 2015 (EDT)
- Add your username here.