Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2015/Where in the World is Wikipedia: A Look at the Geographic Distribution Audited Content on the English WIkipedia"
Brion VIBBER (talk | contribs) (+video recording from Commons) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
;Abstract: |
;Abstract: |
||
| + | |||
| + | Video recording of session on Commons at [[:File:Where in the World is Wikipedia - A Look at the Geographic Distribution Audited Content on the English Wikipedia.webm]] |
||
| + | |||
In recent years there has been a large discussion of systemic bias, what topics are not covered, on the English Wikipedia. The majority of those discussions have focused on what topic areas are less covered and very little work has been done to look at where the majority of articles reside, geographically. Using audited content, good articles and featured articles, as the data corpus, I am going to show where in North America has the highest density of high quality articles on the English Wikipedia and where is lacking. |
In recent years there has been a large discussion of systemic bias, what topics are not covered, on the English Wikipedia. The majority of those discussions have focused on what topic areas are less covered and very little work has been done to look at where the majority of articles reside, geographically. Using audited content, good articles and featured articles, as the data corpus, I am going to show where in North America has the highest density of high quality articles on the English Wikipedia and where is lacking. |
||
Latest revision as of 18:48, 25 October 2015
- Title
- Where in the World is Wikipedia: A Look at the Geographic Distribution Audited Content on the English Wikipedia
- Theme
- Community
- Type
- Presentation
- Author
- Thomas Fish
- E-mail address
- tfish [at] guerillero.net
- Username
- Guerillero
- Affiliation
- N/A
- Abstract
Video recording of session on Commons at File:Where in the World is Wikipedia - A Look at the Geographic Distribution Audited Content on the English Wikipedia.webm
In recent years there has been a large discussion of systemic bias, what topics are not covered, on the English Wikipedia. The majority of those discussions have focused on what topic areas are less covered and very little work has been done to look at where the majority of articles reside, geographically. Using audited content, good articles and featured articles, as the data corpus, I am going to show where in North America has the highest density of high quality articles on the English Wikipedia and where is lacking.
- Length of presentation
- 15 min
- Special schedule requests
- N/A
- Will you attend WikiConference USA if your submission is not accepted?
- Maybe. It depends on my employment situation
Interested attendees
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).
- Gamaliel (talk) 15:59, 21 August 2015 (EDT)
- Smartyllama (talk) 23:17, 22 August 2015 (EDT)
- NegMawon (talk) 18:24, 24 August 2015 (EDT)
- --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:27, 28 August 2015 (EDT)
- Gaurav (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2015 (EDT)
- Fuzheado (talk) 12:14, 31 August 2015 (EDT)
- Jami (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:17, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
- Samantha (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:03, 3 September 2015 (EDT)
- Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:54, 9 September 2015 (EDT)
- DStrassmann (talk) 00:01, 9 October 2015 (EDT)
- Wa17gs (talk) 13:05, 10 October 2015 (EDT)
- EpochFail (talk) 14:36, 10 October 2015 (EDT)