Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2016/Obfuscating the Problems of Biasing on Wikipedia"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
;Title: Obfuscating the Problems of Biasing on Wikipedia
 
;Title: Obfuscating the Problems of Biasing on Wikipedia
   
;[[Submissions#Proposal Themes|Theme]]: <!-- Education -->
+
;[[Submissions#Proposal Themes|Theme]]: Education
   
;[[Submissions#Academic Peer Review Option|Academic Peer Review option]]: <!-- Yes -->
+
;[[Submissions#Academic Peer Review Option|Academic Peer Review option]]: Yes
   
;[[Submissions#Presentation Types|Type of submission]]: <!-- Panel, Workshop, or Presentation -->
+
;[[Submissions#Presentation Types|Type of submission]]: Panel, Workshop, or Presentation
   
 
;Author: Arjun Krishnappa
 
;Author: Arjun Krishnappa
   
;E-mail address: <!-- arjunaru25@gmail.com -->
+
;E-mail address: arjunaru25@gmail.com
   
 
;Username: Arjun
 
;Username: Arjun
   
;Affiliation: <!-- University of Dayton-->
+
;Affiliation: University of Dayton
   
;Abstract: <!-- Biasing problems in the content by authors makes a content unreliable for students, instructors, scientists, etc. Before allowing the author's content into wikipedia, the author should be tested if the content he/she writes is biased or not. One way to test is by evaluating how well the author can write a content without biasing, using several samples of the author's previous work. Although the evaluation process for checking if the work is biased or unbiased might appear to be long, the integrity and reliability of the wikipedia's content can be elevated. ->
+
;Abstract: Biasing problems in the content by authors makes a content unreliable for students, instructors, scientists, etc. Before allowing the author's content into wikipedia, the author should be tested if the content he/she writes is biased or not. One way to test is by evaluating how well the author can write a content without biasing, using several samples of the author's previous work. Although the evaluation process for checking if the work is biased or unbiased might appear to be long, the integrity and reliability of the wikipedia's content can be elevated.
   
;Length of presentation: <!-- 30-45 min. for panels, 30-75 min. for workshops, 15-30 min. for presentations -->
+
;Length of presentation: 30-45 min. for panels, 30-75 min. for workshops, 15-30 min. for presentations
   
;Preferred room size: <!-- 25 -->
+
;Preferred room size: 25
   
;Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?:
+
;Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?: Yes
   
 
<!-- Do not edit the section below. -->
 
<!-- Do not edit the section below. -->

Revision as of 03:33, 1 September 2016

Title
Obfuscating the Problems of Biasing on Wikipedia
Theme
Education
Academic Peer Review option
Yes
Type of submission
Panel, Workshop, or Presentation
Author
Arjun Krishnappa
E-mail address
arjunaru25@gmail.com
Username
Arjun
Affiliation
University of Dayton
Abstract
Biasing problems in the content by authors makes a content unreliable for students, instructors, scientists, etc. Before allowing the author's content into wikipedia, the author should be tested if the content he/she writes is biased or not. One way to test is by evaluating how well the author can write a content without biasing, using several samples of the author's previous work. Although the evaluation process for checking if the work is biased or unbiased might appear to be long, the integrity and reliability of the wikipedia's content can be elevated.
Length of presentation
30-45 min. for panels, 30-75 min. for workshops, 15-30 min. for presentations
Preferred room size
25
Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?
Yes

Interested attendees

If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).

  1. Arjun