Edit 2015/Disputed Notability - A Hands on Workshop: 2024/Main Page

Disputed Notability - A Hands-On Workshop

Community

Workshop

Authors

Kasey Baker and Frank Jones

Email

kayzbaker911@gmail

Usernames

Kayz911 and Frankcjones:

Groups

North Carolina Triangle Wikipedians:

Abstract

Notability, what does it mean within Wikipedia? This is a subject that many of us have wrestled with far too often, yet we are left to our personal threshold for what we establish to be notable.

In our presentation, we will show you just how arbitrary this could be, by presenting a selection of Wikipedia articles, some have been accepted and some have been rejected for lacking notability. Decide for yourself if an article should be accepted or rejected, and then learn the fate of the article and what the community said about it. Together, let’s have a frank discussion whether or not notability standards are being applied fairly, or if we should take a real look into establishing some concrete notability guidelines.

Participants should come away with a keen understanding of this dilemma, how notability is currently defined, and some solutions to improve the standard.:

Time

60 mins

Special schedule requests

None

Will you attend WikiConference USA if your submission is not accepted?

maybe depending on if we get a scholarship or not

Interested attendees[edit | edit source]

If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).

1. I am excited to hear a presentation from this Wikipedia group. See you at the conference! Blue Rasberry (talk) 07:38, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
2. Megs (talk) 13:28, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
3. Frankcjones (talk) 23:01, 1 September 2015 (EDT)
4. DocTree (talk) 22:46, 3 September 2015 (EDT)
5. Rosiestep (talk) 01:40, 6 September 2015 (EDT)
6. Ongmianli Ongmianli (talk) 16:30, 8 September 2015 (EDT)
7. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:40, 9 September 2015 (EDT)