Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2016/An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays"
ClassicBean (talk | contribs) |
ClassicBean (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays |
An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays |
||
<!-- Simply provide information about your submission below and save the page. --> |
<!-- Simply provide information about your submission below and save the page. --> |
||
| + | ;Title: An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays |
||
| − | ;Title: |
||
;[[Submissions#Proposal Themes|Theme]]: <!-- community, tech, outreach, GLAM, or education --> |
;[[Submissions#Proposal Themes|Theme]]: <!-- community, tech, outreach, GLAM, or education --> |
||
| + | Education and Academic Engagement |
||
;[[Submissions#Academic Peer Review Option|Academic Peer Review option]]: <!-- y/n whether the author(s) wishes to be considered by academic peer review subcommittee --> |
;[[Submissions#Academic Peer Review Option|Academic Peer Review option]]: <!-- y/n whether the author(s) wishes to be considered by academic peer review subcommittee --> |
||
| − | ;[[Submissions#Presentation Types|Type of submission]]: <!-- panel, workshop, or presentation --> |
+ | ;[[Submissions#Presentation Types|Type of submission]]: Panel<!-- panel, workshop, or presentation --> |
| − | ;Author: |
+ | ;Author: Erik Bean, Ed.D. |
| − | ;E-mail address: <!-- this field must be entered, otherwise, submission will not be checked --> |
+ | ;E-mail address: profbean@gmail.coom<!-- this field must be entered, otherwise, submission will not be checked --> |
;Username: ClassicBean |
;Username: ClassicBean |
||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
For years higher education writing standards has struggled to allow the use of Wikipedia for college essay citations and references. The academicians say that information should be peer reviewed and that those with "legitimate" authorship are commonly accepted. However, not all sources in databases, on Websites, in published journals, magazines, and newspapers, for example, that are used in college essays are as rigorous. Therefore, while not all Wikipedia material is as rigorous as peer reviewed, most of the material falls under the same attribution standards common to those essays that include non peer reviewed materials. Thus, allowing Wikipedia as an option for a quality source should be based on the merit of the information posted in Wikipedia and the trail of those who contribute, particularly in cases where anonymity is less problematic. As is the case with any college essay, all sources are judged based on the quality of their merit and using Wikipedia should represent some of the sources, and not all. |
For years higher education writing standards has struggled to allow the use of Wikipedia for college essay citations and references. The academicians say that information should be peer reviewed and that those with "legitimate" authorship are commonly accepted. However, not all sources in databases, on Websites, in published journals, magazines, and newspapers, for example, that are used in college essays are as rigorous. Therefore, while not all Wikipedia material is as rigorous as peer reviewed, most of the material falls under the same attribution standards common to those essays that include non peer reviewed materials. Thus, allowing Wikipedia as an option for a quality source should be based on the merit of the information posted in Wikipedia and the trail of those who contribute, particularly in cases where anonymity is less problematic. As is the case with any college essay, all sources are judged based on the quality of their merit and using Wikipedia should represent some of the sources, and not all. |
||
| − | ;Length of presentation: <!-- 30-45 min. for panels, 30-75 min. for workshops, 15-30 min. for presentations --> |
+ | ;Length of presentation: 30-75 min. <!-- 30-45 min. for panels, 30-75 min. for workshops, 15-30 min. for presentations --> |
;Special schedule requests: <!-- (for example - can not present on Saturday) --> |
;Special schedule requests: <!-- (for example - can not present on Saturday) --> |
||
| − | ;Preferred room size: <!-- (how many do you think will be in audience? e.g. 10, 25, 50, 100, will try to match, but larger rooms have limited availability) --> |
+ | ;Preferred room size: 50 <!-- (how many do you think will be in audience? e.g. 10, 25, 50, 100, will try to match, but larger rooms have limited availability) --> |
| − | ;Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?: |
+ | ;Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?: |
<!-- Do not edit the section below. --> |
<!-- Do not edit the section below. --> |
||
Revision as of 01:32, 18 August 2016
An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays
- Title
- An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays
Education and Academic Engagement
- Type of submission
- Panel
- Author
- Erik Bean, Ed.D.
- E-mail address
- profbean@gmail.coom
- Username
- ClassicBean
- Affiliation
- Abstract
For years higher education writing standards has struggled to allow the use of Wikipedia for college essay citations and references. The academicians say that information should be peer reviewed and that those with "legitimate" authorship are commonly accepted. However, not all sources in databases, on Websites, in published journals, magazines, and newspapers, for example, that are used in college essays are as rigorous. Therefore, while not all Wikipedia material is as rigorous as peer reviewed, most of the material falls under the same attribution standards common to those essays that include non peer reviewed materials. Thus, allowing Wikipedia as an option for a quality source should be based on the merit of the information posted in Wikipedia and the trail of those who contribute, particularly in cases where anonymity is less problematic. As is the case with any college essay, all sources are judged based on the quality of their merit and using Wikipedia should represent some of the sources, and not all.
- Length of presentation
- 30-75 min.
- Special schedule requests
- Preferred room size
- 50
- Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?
Interested attendees
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).
- Add your username here.