Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2016/An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays
 
 
<!-- Simply provide information about your submission below and save the page. -->
 
<!-- Simply provide information about your submission below and save the page. -->
 
;Title: An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays
 
;Title: An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays
Line 12: Line 11:
 
;Author: Erik Bean, Ed.D.
 
;Author: Erik Bean, Ed.D.
   
;E-mail address: profbean@gmail.coom<!-- this field must be entered, otherwise, submission will not be checked -->
+
;E-mail address: profbean@gmail.com<!-- this field must be entered, otherwise, submission will not be checked -->
   
 
;Username: ClassicBean
 
;Username: ClassicBean
   
;Affiliation: <!-- organization, company, etc. -->
+
;Affiliation: <!-- organization, company, etc. --> http://www.drerikbean.com
   
 
;Abstract: <!-- at least 300 words to describe your proposal -->
 
;Abstract: <!-- at least 300 words to describe your proposal -->

Revision as of 01:34, 18 August 2016

Title
An Argument for Allowing Wiki References in College Essays
Theme

Education and Academic Engagement

Academic Peer Review option
Type of submission
Panel
Author
Erik Bean, Ed.D.
E-mail address
profbean@gmail.com
Username
ClassicBean
Affiliation
http://www.drerikbean.com
Abstract

For years higher education writing standards has struggled to allow the use of Wikipedia for college essay citations and references. The academicians say that information should be peer reviewed and that those with "legitimate" authorship are commonly accepted. However, not all sources in databases, on Websites, in published journals, magazines, and newspapers, for example, that are used in college essays are as rigorous. Therefore, while not all Wikipedia material is as rigorous as peer reviewed, most of the material falls under the same attribution standards common to those essays that include non peer reviewed materials. Thus, allowing Wikipedia as an option for a quality source should be based on the merit of the information posted in Wikipedia and the trail of those who contribute, particularly in cases where anonymity is less problematic. As is the case with any college essay, all sources are judged based on the quality of their merit and using Wikipedia should represent some of the sources, and not all.

Length of presentation
30-75 min.
Special schedule requests
Preferred room size
50
Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?

Interested attendees

If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).

  1. Add your username here.