Edit WCNA 2019 Session Submission: Submissions:2019/"WikiHealth": Results of a comprehensive review of academic health literature and Wikipedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group:
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your
"WikiHealth": Results of a comprehensive review of academic health literature and Wikipedia
Reliability of Information
Relationship Building & Support
Inclusion and Diversity
Editor Recruitment & Retention
Tech & Tools
Harassment Civility & Safety
Type of session
Please describe your proposal in at least 300 words.
If you have any relevant webpages, slidedecks, etc., you may link them here.
While two systematic reviews of scholarly Wikipedia literature have been conducted, a review that focuses specifically on the treatment of Wikipedia in scholarly health literature has not yet been reported. In light of the limited academic discourse around Wikipedia as a health information resource, the author conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to gain deeper insight into what is currently known about Wikipedia as a health information source and how Wikipedia is treated in this regard. In an effort to retrieve all records within the scope of health and medicine, the author developed and executed a broad literature search strategy in OVID Medline, OVID Embase, CINAHL, LISTA, Wilson’s Web, AMED, and Web of Science. Database records were screened first by title and abstract, then by full-text. Records were excluded if: Wikipedia was not a major or exclusive focus of the article; Wikipedia was not discussed within the context of a health or medical topic; the article was not available in English (no funds were available to support translation for this review), or; the article was a letter, commentary, editorial, or popular media article. The literature search retrieved 2,213 unique results. 89 articles and conference proceedings were included in the review. Two overarching themes, with various sub-themes, emerged from these results: (1) Evidence to position Wikipedia as an online health information resource for consumers (such as patients), practitioners, and students, and; (2) the utility of Wikipedia for research and education. The proposed presentation will dive deeper into these findings. While Wikipedia is well into its second decade, the academic discourse around Wikipedia within the context of health is young. Several questions have not been asked within the literature that are instrumental in understanding Wikipedia’s role as a health information resource. Possibilities for future research will be discussed. Presentation Slides [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1t1FWGH45b974skmeNifAcm5q3pA-5KO9T8w3FobMYKU/edit?usp=sharing]
Academic Peer Review option
Select this option if you are making an academic submission that you would like evaluated by a subset of academics serving on the Program Committee. Learn more
To avoid spambots, use
in place of
Affiliated organization(s) (optional)
The organization, company, Wikimedia affiliate, etc. that you are representing, if applicable.
Preferred room size
Have you presented on this topic previously?
If yes, where/when?
If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program?
(e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)
If you are creating a slidedeck for your presentation, please upload it to the
with a free license, and include all suitable attribution in the slidedeck for any images used.
Watch this page
Retrieved from "
Safe space policy
Past and partners
Learn about WikiCred
What links here