Edit WCNA 2019 Session Submission: Submissions:2019/Wikidata-fying Northeastern University's "Women Writers in Review" initiative
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
The action you have requested is limited to users in the group:
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your
Wikidata-fying Northeastern University's "Women Writers in Review" initiative
Reliability of Information
Relationship Building & Support
Inclusion and Diversity
Editor Recruitment & Retention
Tech & Tools
Harassment Civility & Safety
Type of session
Please describe your proposal in at least 300 words.
If you have any relevant webpages, slidedecks, etc., you may link them here.
[https://wwp.northeastern.edu/review/ "Women Writers in Review"] is an initiative of the Digital Scholarship Group at Northeastern University where I serve as [https://dsg.neu.edu/welcome-wikipedia-visiting-scholar/ Visiting Scholar]. The initiative encompasses pre-20th-century English language women writers, their works, reviews of their works, and scoring of the reviews (P444) by academics. The initiative supports research into the transatlantic reception and readership of early texts by women ("cultures of reception"). Using structured data to model the work enables analysis, identification, and depiction of gender bias over a particular time period (pre-XX-c) and language (English). In consultation with Amanda Rust (Northeastern University), Will Kent (Wiki Education Foundation), Lane Rasberry (University of Virginia), and Mike Peel (Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias), I've developed a Wikidata model to depict this research. The session will include a visualization of the data and findings, approaches to developing the model, and discussion as to how this model might be used by other academic institutions to contribute their unique data sets to Wikidata. While this presentation focuses on Wikidata, it also relates to WikiCite.
Academic Peer Review option
Select this option if you are making an academic submission that you would like evaluated by a subset of academics serving on the Program Committee. Learn more
To avoid spambots, use
in place of
Affiliated organization(s) (optional)
The organization, company, Wikimedia affiliate, etc. that you are representing, if applicable.
Preferred room size
Have you presented on this topic previously?
If yes, where/when?
If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program?
(e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)
If you are creating a slidedeck for your presentation, please upload it to the
with a free license, and include all suitable attribution in the slidedeck for any images used.
Watch this page
Retrieved from "
Safe space policy
Safe space policy
Past and partners
Learn about WikiCred
What links here