Submissions:2015/Vandalism

Title

What is Vandalism?

Theme

Outreach Community

Type of submission

Workshop inclusion

Author

Joseph L. Russell, Jr.

E-mail address

Username

Metlifeccc

Affiliation

West Regal

Abstract

On Wikipedia, vandalism is the act of editing the project in a malicious manner that is intentionally disruptive. Vandalism includes the addition, removal, or other modification of the text or other material that is either humorous, nonsensical, a hoax, or that is of an offensive, humiliating, or otherwise degrading nature.

UserTalk

--Metlifeccc (talk) 17:09, 20 August 2015 (EDT)I was simply trying to upload a article I considered most humorous. The content portal has supplied me with more wisdom to contact an administrator because of this disabling blocking policy. Redrose64 I have no home talk page. Brandleclawx is a page which has born more than one account talk page. Is this possible and do I am often lose? Is this an example of fairer Wikipedia policy. I don't want to excuse her of her Vandalism or lose any of my privileges. Let's have this dispute reviewed by our administrators first. I'll apologize if I am defeating our Wikipedia.

Hello, I'm Redrose64. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Redrose64 (talk) 15:02, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GZWDer. An edit that you recently made to Template:Humorous essay seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! GZWDer (talk) 08:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Template talk:Humorous essay. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Community Policy

Throughout its history, Wikipedia has struggled to maintain a balance between allowing the freedom of open editing and protecting the truth and accuracy of its information when false information can be potentially damaging to its subjects. Vandalism is easy to commit on Wikipedia because anyone can edit the site, with the exception of articles that are currently semi-protected, which means that new and unregistered users cannot edit them.

Vandalism can be committed by either guest editors or those with registered accounts; however, a semi-protected or protected page can only be edited by auto-confirmed or registered Wikipedia editors, or administrators, respectively. Frequent targets of vandalism include articles on hot and controversial topics, famous celebrities and current events. In some cases, people have been falsely reported as having died. This has notably occurred to United States Senators Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd (both of whom are now deceased), and American rapper Kanye West (who is not deceased).

The challenge from vandalism in Wikipedia was once characterized by the former Encyclopædia Britannica editor-in-chief Robert McHenry: "The user who visits Wikipedia...is rather in the position of a visitor to a public restroom. It may be obviously dirty, so that he knows to exercise great care, or it may seem fairly clean, so that he may be lulled into a false sense of security. What he certainly does not know is who has used the facilities before him."

Fighting vandalism

Other notable acts of vandalism

• In 2006, Rolling Stone printed a story about Halle Berry based on false information from an act of Wikipedia vandalism.
• A person from Łódź was attacking Polish Wikipedia throughout 2006 and early 2007, inserting profanity and pictures of penises and anuses into pages (especially ones related with Catholicism or Polish politicians), without any reaction from his internet provider, Neostrada. The vandal's activity finished when he was deprived of his internet connection, but not before the entire city of Łódź had to be blocked from editing Wikipedia for three days.
• Professional golfer Fuzzy Zoeller sued a Miami company whose IP-based edits to the Wikipedia site included negative information about him.
• In May 2012, media critic Anita Sarkeesian created a Kickstarter project, intending to raise money to make a series of videos exploring sexism in digital gaming culture. The idea evoked a hostile, misogynous response, which included repeated vandalism of Sarkeesian's Wikipedia article with pornographic imagery, defamatory statements, and threats of sexual violence. More than 12 anonymous editors contributed to the ongoing vandalism campaign before editing privileges were revoked for the page.
• In November 2012, the Leveson report—published in the UK by Lord Justice Leveson—incorrectly listed a "Brett Straub" as one of the founders of The Independent newspaper. The name originated from one of several erroneous edits by one of Straub's friends as a prank to Wikipedia by falsely including his name in several articles across the site. The name's inclusion in the report suggested that that part of the report relating to that newspaper had been cut and pasted from Wikipedia without sources first being checked. The Straub issue was also humorously referenced in broadcasts of BBC entertainment current affairs TV programme Have I Got News for You (and extended edition Have I Got a Bit More News for You), with The Economist also making passing comment on the issue: "The Leveson report...Parts of it are a scissors-and-paste job culled from Wikipedia".
• In July 2015, presidential candidate Donald Trump's entire Wikipedia page was deleted and replaced with the solitary sentence "Let's be fair, nobody cares about him."

See also

• Reliability of Wikipedia

References

Length of presentation

30-75 minute workshops with interactive examples and facilitation

Special schedule requests

Early in Sessions when contributors are fresh

Will you attend WikiConference USA if your submission is not accepted?

No

Interested attendees

If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).

1. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:04, 20 August 2015 (EDT)
2. Add your username here.