Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2021/Current developments in Wikipedia-integrated academic journals"
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|theme=Relationship Building & Support |
|theme=Relationship Building & Support |
||
|type=Presentation |
|type=Presentation |
||
| + | |abstract= |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | '''Bridging the academia-Wikimedia divide from both sides of the river:''' Current developments in Wikipedia-integrated academic journals |
||
| + | |||
| ⚫ | |||
One key method of encouraging greater involvement therefore involves rewarding experts with citeable academic publications. WikiJournals couple the rigour of formal academic peer review with the massive reach and impact of Wikipedia by dual-publication of review articles in both the journal and into Wikipedia. Peer reviewer comments are also published to enhance transparency and auditability of the review process. As well as articles written from scratch, existing high-quality Wikipedia articles can be submitted for the same process as a form of quality control. |
One key method of encouraging greater involvement therefore involves rewarding experts with citeable academic publications. WikiJournals couple the rigour of formal academic peer review with the massive reach and impact of Wikipedia by dual-publication of review articles in both the journal and into Wikipedia. Peer reviewer comments are also published to enhance transparency and auditability of the review process. As well as articles written from scratch, existing high-quality Wikipedia articles can be submitted for the same process as a form of quality control. |
||
The published journal article acts as a stable, indexed, cite-able version of record. The version copied into Wikipedia is a highly visible, living version and contains a prominent link to the journal publication for any readers that wish to cite the reviewed version or check reviewer comments. |
The published journal article acts as a stable, indexed, cite-able version of record. The version copied into Wikipedia is a highly visible, living version and contains a prominent link to the journal publication for any readers that wish to cite the reviewed version or check reviewer comments. |
||
| − | :Example in |
+ | :''Example in Wikipedia as'': [[w:Radiocarbon dating|Radiocarbon dating]] |
| − | :Example in Wiki.J.Sci. as: Christie, M; et al. (2018). "Radiocarbon dating". WikiJournal of Science 1 (1): 6. [https://doi.org/10.15347/wjs/2018.006 doi:10.15347/wjs/2018.006] |
+ | :''Example in Wiki.J.Sci. as'': Christie, M; et al. (2018). "Radiocarbon dating". WikiJournal of Science 1 (1): 6. [https://doi.org/10.15347/wjs/2018.006 doi:10.15347/wjs/2018.006] |
The journals additionally pioneer several uncommon features. Most notably, they are able to publish open access without fees to authors, since web hosting is provided by the WikiMedia Foundation and all editorial staff are volunteers. Using the same MediaWiki software as Wikipedia also enables easy transfer of content between the two sites. Any content incorporated from Wikipedia via a creative commons license is fully attributed, including contributions of anonymous or even automated authors. Authors also have no ownership over the Wikipedia version of their work, which will be freely edited and updated by others over the following years or decades. |
The journals additionally pioneer several uncommon features. Most notably, they are able to publish open access without fees to authors, since web hosting is provided by the WikiMedia Foundation and all editorial staff are volunteers. Using the same MediaWiki software as Wikipedia also enables easy transfer of content between the two sites. Any content incorporated from Wikipedia via a creative commons license is fully attributed, including contributions of anonymous or even automated authors. Authors also have no ownership over the Wikipedia version of their work, which will be freely edited and updated by others over the following years or decades. |
||
| Line 18: | Line 21: | ||
WikiJournals therefore benefit both academic and wikipedic communities. The encyclopedia gains high quality work from authors and reviewers who would not otherwise have contributed. Authors, are rewarded with citable, indexed publications that have a greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing. |
WikiJournals therefore benefit both academic and wikipedic communities. The encyclopedia gains high quality work from authors and reviewers who would not otherwise have contributed. Authors, are rewarded with citable, indexed publications that have a greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing. |
||
|academic=No |
|academic=No |
||
| − | |author= |
+ | |author= Kelee Pacion and Eric Youngstrom (submitted by Thomas Shafee) |
|email=contact{{@}}wikijsci.org |
|email=contact{{@}}wikijsci.org |
||
| − | |username=[[meta:user:Evolution and Evolvability|Evolution and Evolvability]] |
+ | |username= [[meta:User:Saguaromelee|Saguaromelee]] and [[meta:User:Eyoungstrom|Eyoungstrom]] (submitted by [[meta:user:Evolution and Evolvability|Evolution and Evolvability]] ) |
|affiliates=WikiJournal User Group |
|affiliates=WikiJournal User Group |
||
| − | |time=30 mins |
+ | |time=30 mins to present + 5-10 mins for questions |
|presented=yes - Open Publishing Fest, American Psychological Association, wikimania (unconference session) |
|presented=yes - Open Publishing Fest, American Psychological Association, wikimania (unconference session) |
||
|present-other=Yes |
|present-other=Yes |
||
| − | |status= |
+ | |status=Accepted |
}} |
}} |
||
Latest revision as of 09:07, 3 October 2021
This submission has been accepted for WikiConference North America 2021.
Title:
- Current developments in Wikipedia-integrated academic journals
Theme:
- Relationship Building & Support
Type of session:
- Presentation
Abstract:
Bridging the academia-Wikimedia divide from both sides of the river: Current developments in Wikipedia-integrated academic journals
Despite the clear importance of Wikipedia in the contemporary knowledge ecosystem, academics, scholars and experts rarely contribute to creating, improving or curating its content. One key method of encouraging greater involvement therefore involves rewarding experts with citeable academic publications. WikiJournals couple the rigour of formal academic peer review with the massive reach and impact of Wikipedia by dual-publication of review articles in both the journal and into Wikipedia. Peer reviewer comments are also published to enhance transparency and auditability of the review process. As well as articles written from scratch, existing high-quality Wikipedia articles can be submitted for the same process as a form of quality control. The published journal article acts as a stable, indexed, cite-able version of record. The version copied into Wikipedia is a highly visible, living version and contains a prominent link to the journal publication for any readers that wish to cite the reviewed version or check reviewer comments.
- Example in Wikipedia as: Radiocarbon dating
- Example in Wiki.J.Sci. as: Christie, M; et al. (2018). "Radiocarbon dating". WikiJournal of Science 1 (1): 6. doi:10.15347/wjs/2018.006
The journals additionally pioneer several uncommon features. Most notably, they are able to publish open access without fees to authors, since web hosting is provided by the WikiMedia Foundation and all editorial staff are volunteers. Using the same MediaWiki software as Wikipedia also enables easy transfer of content between the two sites. Any content incorporated from Wikipedia via a creative commons license is fully attributed, including contributions of anonymous or even automated authors. Authors also have no ownership over the Wikipedia version of their work, which will be freely edited and updated by others over the following years or decades.
The WikiJournal User Group now includes:
- WikiJournal of Medicine (flagship), www.WikiJMed.org
- WikiJournal of Science (STEM topics), www.WikiJSci.org
- WikiJournal of Humanities (arts, humanities and soc. sciences), www.WikiJHum.org
WikiJournals therefore benefit both academic and wikipedic communities. The encyclopedia gains high quality work from authors and reviewers who would not otherwise have contributed. Authors, are rewarded with citable, indexed publications that have a greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.
Academic Peer Review option:
- No
Author name:
E-mail address:
- contact
wikijsci.org
Wikimedia username:
Affiliated organization(s):
- WikiJournal User Group
Estimated time:
- 30 mins to present + 5-10 mins for questions
Special requests:
Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:
- yes - Open Publishing Fest, American Psychological Association, wikimania (unconference session)
If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)
- Yes