Difference between revisions of "Submissions talk:2021/Reflecting on a critique"
(copyedits) |
(sources cited by the critique) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
To me this is an important issue and I hope I can attend at least a lightning talk about it. I've been in a bunch of discussions about this, and one comment is that we would want a broader set of sources and analyses than the one essay. There are doubts about its analysis, but I did not dig into the details of that. (Will send details to the submitting author here.) |
To me this is an important issue and I hope I can attend at least a lightning talk about it. I've been in a bunch of discussions about this, and one comment is that we would want a broader set of sources and analyses than the one essay. There are doubts about its analysis, but I did not dig into the details of that. (Will send details to the submitting author here.) |
||
| − | In |
+ | In a presentation on this, it might be good to summarize the Greenstein and Zhu analysis which this critique addresses. [https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.102.3.343], [https://misq.org/do-experts-or-crowd-based-models-produce-more-bias-evidence-from-encyclopedia-britannica-and-wikipedia.html] |
Bias and misinformation are related and they are important topics for this conference and future related conferences. Generally I/we don't want Wikimedia or its processes to be biased toward left-of-center views, but super informative and relatively neutral. I think we have a broad consensus on that but there is always risk. -- [[User:Econterms|Econterms]] ([[User talk:Econterms|talk]]) 17:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC) |
Bias and misinformation are related and they are important topics for this conference and future related conferences. Generally I/we don't want Wikimedia or its processes to be biased toward left-of-center views, but super informative and relatively neutral. I think we have a broad consensus on that but there is always risk. -- [[User:Econterms|Econterms]] ([[User talk:Econterms|talk]]) 17:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 06:54, 4 October 2021
To me this is an important issue and I hope I can attend at least a lightning talk about it. I've been in a bunch of discussions about this, and one comment is that we would want a broader set of sources and analyses than the one essay. There are doubts about its analysis, but I did not dig into the details of that. (Will send details to the submitting author here.)
In a presentation on this, it might be good to summarize the Greenstein and Zhu analysis which this critique addresses. [1], [2]
Bias and misinformation are related and they are important topics for this conference and future related conferences. Generally I/we don't want Wikimedia or its processes to be biased toward left-of-center views, but super informative and relatively neutral. I think we have a broad consensus on that but there is always risk. -- Econterms (talk) 17:22, 3 October 2021 (UTC)