Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2016/Developing community norms for critical bots and tools"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
BDavis (WMF) (talk | contribs) (tweak display on category page) |
BDavis (WMF) (talk | contribs) m (fight link rot) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
;[[Submissions#Presentation Types|Type of submission]] |
;[[Submissions#Presentation Types|Type of submission]] |
||
:Presentation (and possible unconference follow-up meetings) |
:Presentation (and possible unconference follow-up meetings) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ;Related pages |
||
| + | :[[wikitech:User:BryanDavis/Developing community norms for critical bots and tools]] |
||
| + | :[https://bd808-test.toolforge.org/community-norms-talk/ slides on Toolforge] |
||
| + | :[[m:Requests for comment/Abandoned Labs tools]] |
||
| + | :[[wikitech:Help:Tool Labs/Abandoned tool policy]] |
||
| + | :[[wikitech:Help:Tool Labs/Right to fork policy]] |
||
;Author |
;Author |
||
| Line 46: | Line 53: | ||
'''If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).''' |
'''If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).''' |
||
| + | # [[User:Jarekt|Jarekt]] ([[User talk:Jarekt|talk]]) 15:03, 29 August 2016 (EDT) |
||
| − | |||
| + | # [[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] ([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]]) 15:25, 30 August 2016 (EDT) |
||
| + | # [[User:Mxn|Minh <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">Nguyễn</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Mxn|<span style="display: inline-block;">💬</span>]]</sup> 11:18, 1 September 2016 (EDT) |
||
# ''Add your username here.'' |
# ''Add your username here.'' |
||
| − | [[Category:Submissions/2016|Developing community norms for critical bots and tools]] |
+ | [[Category:Submissions/2016|Developing community norms for critical bots and tools]] [[Category:Submissions in 2016, technology|Developing community norms for critical bots and tools]] [[Category:Submissions in 2016, community|Developing community norms for critical bots and tools]] |
Latest revision as of 21:05, 31 August 2023
- Title
- Developing community norms for critical bots and tools
- (Don't let your brother-in-law's niece be the only person who keeps your community running)
- Type of submission
- Presentation (and possible unconference follow-up meetings)
- Related pages
- wikitech:User:BryanDavis/Developing community norms for critical bots and tools
- slides on Toolforge
- m:Requests for comment/Abandoned Labs tools
- wikitech:Help:Tool Labs/Abandoned tool policy
- wikitech:Help:Tool Labs/Right to fork policy
- Author
- Bryan Davis
- E-mail address
- bd808@wikimedia.org
- Username
- BDavis (WMF), BryanDavis
- Affiliation
- Wikimedia Foundation, Community Tech, Tool Labs support
- Abstract
- Present real life bot and tool failures with on-wiki impact that might have been avoided by following a few relatively simple guidelines for healthy FLOSS projects.
- Bots and tools are a vital resource for many on-wiki content creation and curation activities. A typical bot/tool project begins life as a way for a motivated Wikimedia community member to make some on-wiki task easier (or possible). These individuals are "scratching their own itch" in the best tradition of open source development. Many of these projects have a short lifecycle due to factors such as loss of interest by the maintainer, insurmountable technical hurdles, or discovery of a better means to manage the original problem. Others however become popular and tightly integrated in the workflows of one or more on-wiki communities.
- Popular tools and bots become de facto production software needed to keep the wikis healthy and happy. Their roots as weekend projects from motivated volunteers brought them their success, but ultimately pose a risk to their end users. Life happens and a single developer project is in perpetual danger of abandonment. Adopting basic FLOSS project practices and following some general rules of professional software and systems management can help protect the software and the wikis.
- Length of presentation
- 30 min.
- Special schedule requests
- N/A
- Preferred room size
- 10-20 (or more if there's interest!)
- Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?
- Unsure
Interested attendees
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).