Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2014/Bridging conversations with the Humanities"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(adding) |
SuperHamster (talk | contribs) m (→Interested attendees: Moving from Category:Submissions to Category:Submissions/2014) |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
;Title of the submission: |
;Title of the submission: |
||
− | ;Themes ([[Submissions#Proposal Themes|Proposal Themes]] - Community |
+ | ;Themes ([[Submissions#Proposal Themes|Proposal Themes]] - Community, Outreach, GLAM, Education): |
;Type of submission: Presentation(20-30 minutes)/Open Conversation (20-40 minutes) |
;Type of submission: Presentation(20-30 minutes)/Open Conversation (20-40 minutes) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
;Abstract ''(at least 300 words to describe your proposal)'': The humanities are increasingly relying on digital spaces to interact with the public through the [[w:en:digital humanities]], and one of the largest impact spaces for that interaction is Wikipedia. However, despite calls by scholars for deliberate academic curation of humanities content, like that by digital humanist and American historian [http://chnm.gmu.edu/essays-on-history-new-media/essays/?essayid=42 Roy Rozenwig], there has been very little active participation from English speaking humanists in Wikimedia projects. Unlike other academic fields which rely on more scientific methods that require analysis and digitally oriented development, and thus often use digital methods, most traditionally trained humanists do not have strong digital literacy skills. Moreover, digital humanities scholars who do have those skills and have tried to apply them to Wikipedia, often turn towards analyzing individual Wikipedia articles or creating reference sources distinct from Wikipedia, rather then actively shaping the community's presentation of their field of knowledge. In my talk I will first posit some of the reasons for the gap in humanist contributions, and propose ways that the community can alter some of its methodology developed in the GLAM-Wiki community and Education Program to actively involve Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in humanities and digital humanities conversations. This talk builds on my research with [[w:en:User:Wadewitz]] on the place of historiography within Wikipedia (paper soon to be published), as well as the various outreach activities I have completed in both the Education Program and GLAM-Wiki community, in project like [[w:en:WP:Blake]]. Following the talk, I will facilitate an open conversations where we address and reflect on various other methods for building humanities conversations, including encouraging active research around humanities topics on Wikipedia, structuring Wikipedia Education assignments around humanist goals, and providing greater fit within the digital humanities. |
;Abstract ''(at least 300 words to describe your proposal)'': The humanities are increasingly relying on digital spaces to interact with the public through the [[w:en:digital humanities]], and one of the largest impact spaces for that interaction is Wikipedia. However, despite calls by scholars for deliberate academic curation of humanities content, like that by digital humanist and American historian [http://chnm.gmu.edu/essays-on-history-new-media/essays/?essayid=42 Roy Rozenwig], there has been very little active participation from English speaking humanists in Wikimedia projects. Unlike other academic fields which rely on more scientific methods that require analysis and digitally oriented development, and thus often use digital methods, most traditionally trained humanists do not have strong digital literacy skills. Moreover, digital humanities scholars who do have those skills and have tried to apply them to Wikipedia, often turn towards analyzing individual Wikipedia articles or creating reference sources distinct from Wikipedia, rather then actively shaping the community's presentation of their field of knowledge. In my talk I will first posit some of the reasons for the gap in humanist contributions, and propose ways that the community can alter some of its methodology developed in the GLAM-Wiki community and Education Program to actively involve Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in humanities and digital humanities conversations. This talk builds on my research with [[w:en:User:Wadewitz]] on the place of historiography within Wikipedia (paper soon to be published), as well as the various outreach activities I have completed in both the Education Program and GLAM-Wiki community, in project like [[w:en:WP:Blake]]. Following the talk, I will facilitate an open conversations where we address and reflect on various other methods for building humanities conversations, including encouraging active research around humanities topics on Wikipedia, structuring Wikipedia Education assignments around humanist goals, and providing greater fit within the digital humanities. |
||
− | ;Length of presentation/talk (see [[Submissions#Presentation Types|Presentation Types]] for lengths of different presentation types): <!-- (if other than 75 minutes, specify how long, and how it might fit into a larger 75 minute thematic session) --> I could |
+ | ;Length of presentation/talk (see [[Submissions#Presentation Types|Presentation Types]] for lengths of different presentation types): <!-- (if other than 75 minutes, specify how long, and how it might fit into a larger 75 minute thematic session) --> I could foresee the combination of presentation and facilitated talk taking as much as 60-70 minutes or as little as 40. If need be, the open conversation on how the humanities could be better integrated into the larger outreach conversation, I would be interested in doing an un-conference event on the Sunday instead. |
;Will you attend WikiConference USA if your submission is not accepted?: If I get a scholarship. |
;Will you attend WikiConference USA if your submission is not accepted?: If I get a scholarship. |
||
;Slides or further information (optional): |
;Slides or further information (optional): |
||
+ | *http://prezi.com/ejzhjai_yqb2/wikipedia-and-the-humanities/ |
||
+ | |||
+ | *Gooogle form for interested users: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1CE_E5MQ4RupTxOJACyLMmn5S3v3tJDAGMvXEt-Hnbxc/viewform?usp=send_form |
||
+ | *[[Wikipedia:Humanities]] |
||
;Special request as to time of presentations: <!-- (for example - can not present on Saturday) --> |
;Special request as to time of presentations: <!-- (for example - can not present on Saturday) --> |
||
Line 34: | Line 38: | ||
'''If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).''' |
'''If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).''' |
||
+ | # [[User:Fhocutt|Fhocutt]] ([[User talk:Fhocutt|talk]]) 02:00, 4 April 2014 (EDT) |
||
+ | # [[User:Timathom|Timathom]] ([[User talk:Timathom|talk]]) 14:48, 7 April 2014 (EDT) |
||
+ | # [[User:GastelEtzwane|GastelEtzwane]] ([[User talk:GastelEtzwane|talk]]) 15:38, 7 April 2014 (EDT) |
||
+ | # [[User:Kosboot|Kosboot]] ([[User talk:Kosboot|talk]]) 14:19, 19 May 2014 (EDT) |
||
+ | # [[User:Geraldshields11|Geraldshields11]] ([[User talk:Geraldshields11|talk]]) 09:04, 27 May 2014 (EDT) |
||
# ''Add your username here.'' |
# ''Add your username here.'' |
||
− | [[Category:Submissions]] |
+ | [[Category:Submissions/2014]] |
Latest revision as of 01:14, 31 August 2016
- Title of the submission
- Themes (Proposal Themes - Community, Outreach, GLAM, Education)
- Type of submission
- Presentation(20-30 minutes)/Open Conversation (20-40 minutes)
- Author of the submission
- Alex Stinson
- E-mail address
- sadads[a]gmail.com
- Username
- Sadads
- US state or country of origin
- United States
- Affiliation, if any (organization, company etc.)
- Kansas State University
- Personal homepage or blog
- http://alexstinson.wordpress.com/
- Abstract (at least 300 words to describe your proposal)
- The humanities are increasingly relying on digital spaces to interact with the public through the w:en:digital humanities, and one of the largest impact spaces for that interaction is Wikipedia. However, despite calls by scholars for deliberate academic curation of humanities content, like that by digital humanist and American historian Roy Rozenwig, there has been very little active participation from English speaking humanists in Wikimedia projects. Unlike other academic fields which rely on more scientific methods that require analysis and digitally oriented development, and thus often use digital methods, most traditionally trained humanists do not have strong digital literacy skills. Moreover, digital humanities scholars who do have those skills and have tried to apply them to Wikipedia, often turn towards analyzing individual Wikipedia articles or creating reference sources distinct from Wikipedia, rather then actively shaping the community's presentation of their field of knowledge. In my talk I will first posit some of the reasons for the gap in humanist contributions, and propose ways that the community can alter some of its methodology developed in the GLAM-Wiki community and Education Program to actively involve Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in humanities and digital humanities conversations. This talk builds on my research with w:en:User:Wadewitz on the place of historiography within Wikipedia (paper soon to be published), as well as the various outreach activities I have completed in both the Education Program and GLAM-Wiki community, in project like w:en:WP:Blake. Following the talk, I will facilitate an open conversations where we address and reflect on various other methods for building humanities conversations, including encouraging active research around humanities topics on Wikipedia, structuring Wikipedia Education assignments around humanist goals, and providing greater fit within the digital humanities.
- Length of presentation/talk (see Presentation Types for lengths of different presentation types)
- I could foresee the combination of presentation and facilitated talk taking as much as 60-70 minutes or as little as 40. If need be, the open conversation on how the humanities could be better integrated into the larger outreach conversation, I would be interested in doing an un-conference event on the Sunday instead.
- Will you attend WikiConference USA if your submission is not accepted?
- If I get a scholarship.
- Slides or further information (optional)
- Gooogle form for interested users: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1CE_E5MQ4RupTxOJACyLMmn5S3v3tJDAGMvXEt-Hnbxc/viewform?usp=send_form
- Wikipedia:Humanities
- Special request as to time of presentations
Interested attendees
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).
- Fhocutt (talk) 02:00, 4 April 2014 (EDT)
- Timathom (talk) 14:48, 7 April 2014 (EDT)
- GastelEtzwane (talk) 15:38, 7 April 2014 (EDT)
- Kosboot (talk) 14:19, 19 May 2014 (EDT)
- Geraldshields11 (talk) 09:04, 27 May 2014 (EDT)
- Add your username here.