Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2018/Archival finding aids in Wikidata? A GLAM discussion"
SuperHamster (talk | contribs) (Marking as pending review) |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
# ''Add your username here.'' |
# ''Add your username here.'' |
||
+ | # [[User:Uncommon fritillary|Uncommon fritillary]] ([[User talk:Uncommon fritillary|talk]]) 01:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC) |
||
[[Category:Submissions/2018]] |
[[Category:Submissions/2018]] |
Revision as of 01:14, 5 September 2018
This submission has been noted and is pending review for WikiConference North America 2018.
- Title
- Archival finding aids in Wikidata? A GLAM discussion
- Theme (optional)
- Relationship Building & Support + Inclusion & Diversity
- Type of submission
- Workshop
- Author
- Rachel Trent
- E-mail address
- racheltrentgwu.edu
- Wikimedia username
- Retrent
- Affiliation(s) (optional)
- George Washington University
- Abstract
What would it look like to put archival resource description (aka, finding aids) into Wikidata? Is Wikidata positioned to revolutionize the way GLAM institutions' "messiest" collections are described and cataloged--and expand the capacity for GLAMs to incorporate researcher/community knowledge? Or . . . not? Join this workshop for a quick presentation followed by group discussion.
For those outside of archives, the finding aid can be a mystifying tool. Born in a pre-computing era, finding aids were originally developed as printed and bound documents to help researchers understand what might be found within boxes of heterogeneous, hierarchically-organized materials, and also to convey historical/biographical information about entities most closely related to collections. Although finding aids have been re-imagined numerous times as the nature of collections and technology has evolved, they continue to be a niche mode of description, which feel at times like fitting a square peg into a round hole--especially when it comes to born-digital archives.
Join us to think about how finding aids might be translated into Wikidata, or how archival description at large might be re-considered in Wikidata context. Come if you have ideas, come if you don't have ideas, come if you're curious, come if you know Wikidata but don't know finding aids (or vice versa), come to find potential partners for projects.
- Length of presentation
- 45 minute workshop
- Special requests
presentation screen + computer hookup
- Preferred room size
- 25
- Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?
- No
- If you will be incorporating a slidedeck during your presentation, do you agree to upload it to Commons before your session, with a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license, including suitable attribution in the slidedeck for any images used?
- Yes
- Will you attend WikiConference North America if your submission is not accepted?
- Maybe, depends on institutional funding
Interested attendees
If you are interested in attending this session, please sign with your username below. This will help reviewers to decide which sessions are of high interest. Sign with four tildes. (~~~~).
- Add your username here.
- Uncommon fritillary (talk) 01:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)