Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2019/Nontraditional Scholarship: Evaluation and Citation"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
<center>{{tag|This session is part of the [[Submissions:2019/WikiCite track|WikiCite track]].}}</center>
 
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission
 
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission
  +
|status=Accepted
 
|theme=Reliability of Information<br />+ Inclusion and Diversity<br />
 
|theme=Reliability of Information<br />+ Inclusion and Diversity<br />
 
|type=Panel
 
|type=Panel
|abstract=Beyond traditional brand-name academic publishers like Wiley and Oxford University Press, how do Wikipedians know when to trust new genres of scholarly research output? Innovative, open-source publishing [https://mindthegap.pubpub.org platforms] such as the [[w:en:Open Science Framework|Open Science Framework]], [https://scalar.me/anvc/scalar/ Scalar], and MIT's PubPub provide exciting new affordances in the knowledge ecosystem. For example, the recent [https://web.archive.org/web/20190928124404/https://harvard-dssg.github.io/boston-area-dss/ Boston Area Digital Scholarship Symposium 2019] included discussion of scholarly efforts such as the [https://afamfolklore.fas.harvard.edu Archive of African American Folklore], the Encyclopedia of the Variant Readings of the Qurʾān, and the [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q8031351 Women Writers Project].
+
|abstract=Beyond traditional brand-name academic publishers like Wiley and Oxford University Press, how do Wikipedians know when to trust new genres of scholarly research output? Innovative, open-source publishing [https://mindthegap.pubpub.org platforms] such as [[w:en:Omeka|Omeka]], [https://scalar.me/anvc/scalar/ Scalar], [[w:en:Open Science Framework|Open Science Framework]], and MIT's PubPub provide exciting new affordances in the knowledge ecosystem.
  +
 
How to evaluate new scholarship outside of traditionally formatted journals and books? What criteria to use? Are there some genres or platforms that should not be cited in Wikipedia? How to represent bibliographic entities in new formats in Wikidata? How to cite new genres in Wikipedia articles? This panel will discuss quality criteria and signifiers related to nontraditional and emerging scholarship that's citable in Wikipedia.
  +
  +
Some examples:
  +
* Khipu Database Project ([https://khipukamayuq.fas.harvard.edu khipukamayuq.fas.harvard.edu])
  +
* Imperiia Project ([http://imperiia.fas.harvard.edu imperiia.fas.harvard.edu])
  +
* Digital Giza ([http://giza.fas.harvard.edu giza.fas.harvard.edu])
  +
  +
Panelists:
  +
* [https://cyber.harvard.edu/~psuber/wiki/Peter_Suber Peter Suber] is the Director of the Harvard Office for Scholarly Communication, Director of the Harvard Open Access Project, and a Senior Researcher at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. By training he's a philosopher and lawyer, and gave up his position as a tenured full professor of philosophy in 2003 to work full-time on open access. He was the principal drafter of the Budapest Open Access Initiative, sits on the boards of many groups devoted to open access and scholarly communication, and has been active in fostering open access for many years through his research, speaking, and writing.
  +
* [https://carolchiodo.com Carol Chiodo], [https://library.harvard.edu/staff/carol-chiodo Librarian for Collections and Digital Scholarship], European Languages Division, Harvard Library. Italian studies specialist. She is especially interested in "building bridges between siloed scholarship and communities in order to foster dynamic and responsive knowledge networks."
  +
* [https://library.harvard.edu/staff/christine-eslao Christine Fernsebner Eslao], Metadata Technologies Program Manager, Harvard Library Information & Technical Services. Co-author of 2019 OCLC report "[https://www.niso.org/niso-io/2019/09/oclc-releases-report-creating-library-linked-data-wikibase Creating Library Linked Data with Wikibase]."
  +
<br>
   
How to evaluate new scholarship outside of traditionally formatted journals and books? What criteria to use? Are there some genres or platforms that should not be cited in Wikipedia? How to represent bibliographic entities in new formats in Wikidata? How to cite new genres in Wikipedia articles? This panel of experts in scholarly communication (TBD) will discuss quality criteria and signifiers of nontraditional and emerging scholarship that's citable in Wikipedia.
 
 
|academic=Yes
 
|academic=Yes
|author=A. Britton
+
|author=Anne Britton
|email=anne_britton{{@}}harvard.edu
+
|email=ab16302020{{@}}gmail.com
 
|time=45 minutes
 
|time=45 minutes
|presented=Not exactly. I presented a poster on "Wikidata for Digital Scholarship" at the 2019 Boston Area Digital Scholarship Symposium.
+
|presented=Not exactly. I presented a poster on "Wikidata for Digital Scholarship" at the 2019 [https://harvard-dssg.github.io/boston-area-dss/ Boston Area Digital Scholarship Symposium].
 
|present-other=Yes
 
|present-other=Yes
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 23:56, 19 December 2019

This session is part of the WikiCite track.

This submission has been accepted for WikiConference North America 2019.



Title:

Nontraditional Scholarship: Evaluation and Citation

Theme:

Reliability of Information
+ Inclusion and Diversity

Type of session:

Panel

Abstract:

Beyond traditional brand-name academic publishers like Wiley and Oxford University Press, how do Wikipedians know when to trust new genres of scholarly research output? Innovative, open-source publishing platforms such as Omeka, Scalar, Open Science Framework, and MIT's PubPub provide exciting new affordances in the knowledge ecosystem.

How to evaluate new scholarship outside of traditionally formatted journals and books? What criteria to use? Are there some genres or platforms that should not be cited in Wikipedia? How to represent bibliographic entities in new formats in Wikidata? How to cite new genres in Wikipedia articles? This panel will discuss quality criteria and signifiers related to nontraditional and emerging scholarship that's citable in Wikipedia.

Some examples:

Panelists:

  • Peter Suber is the Director of the Harvard Office for Scholarly Communication, Director of the Harvard Open Access Project, and a Senior Researcher at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. By training he's a philosopher and lawyer, and gave up his position as a tenured full professor of philosophy in 2003 to work full-time on open access. He was the principal drafter of the Budapest Open Access Initiative, sits on the boards of many groups devoted to open access and scholarly communication, and has been active in fostering open access for many years through his research, speaking, and writing.
  • Carol Chiodo, Librarian for Collections and Digital Scholarship, European Languages Division, Harvard Library. Italian studies specialist. She is especially interested in "building bridges between siloed scholarship and communities in order to foster dynamic and responsive knowledge networks."
  • Christine Fernsebner Eslao, Metadata Technologies Program Manager, Harvard Library Information & Technical Services. Co-author of 2019 OCLC report "Creating Library Linked Data with Wikibase."


Academic Peer Review option:

Yes

Author name:

Anne Britton

E-mail address:

ab16302020@gmail.com

Wikimedia username:

Affiliated organization(s):

Estimated time:

45 minutes

Preferred room size:

Special requests:

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:

Not exactly. I presented a poster on "Wikidata for Digital Scholarship" at the 2019 Boston Area Digital Scholarship Symposium.

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

Yes