Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2019/Nontraditional Scholarship: Evaluation and Citation"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
   
 
Confirmed panelists:
 
Confirmed panelists:
* [[:en:Peter Suber|Peter Suber]], director, Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. Author of nontraditional dynamic scholarly works (<i>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/Societies_and_Open_Access_Research Society Publishers with Open Access Journals]</i> spreadsheet; <i>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/Open_Access_(the_book) Open Access (the book)]</i> wiki) and of writing about new genres (such as "[https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/32988193 The idea of an open-access evidence rack]," 2012). World-renowned expert on [[:en:open access|open access]].
+
* [[:en:Peter Suber|Peter Suber]], Director, Harvard Library Office for Scholarly Communication. Author of nontraditional dynamic scholarly works (<i>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/Societies_and_Open_Access_Research Society Publishers with Open Access Journals]</i> spreadsheet; <i>[https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/Open_Access_(the_book) Open Access (the book)]</i> wiki) and of writing about new genres (such as "[https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/32988193 The idea of an open-access evidence rack]," 2012). World-renowned expert on [[:en:open access|open access]].
  +
* Christine Fernsebner Eslao, Metadata Technologies Program Manager, Harvard Library. [bio forthcoming]
* [Others TBA]
 
  +
* Carol Chiodo, Librarian for Collections and Digital Scholarship, European Languages Division, Harvard Library. [bio forthcoming]
 
<br>
 
<br>
   

Revision as of 18:30, 24 October 2019

This submission has been accepted for WikiConference North America 2019.



Title:

Nontraditional Scholarship: Evaluation and Citation

Theme:

Reliability of Information
+ Inclusion and Diversity

Type of session:

Panel

Abstract:

Beyond traditional brand-name academic publishers like Wiley and Oxford University Press, how do Wikipedians know when to trust new genres of scholarly research output? Innovative, open-source publishing platforms such as Omeka, Scalar, Open Science Framework, and MIT's PubPub provide exciting new affordances in the knowledge ecosystem.

How to evaluate new scholarship outside of traditionally formatted journals and books? What criteria to use? Are there some genres or platforms that should not be cited in Wikipedia? How to represent bibliographic entities in new formats in Wikidata? How to cite new genres in Wikipedia articles? This panel will discuss quality criteria and signifiers related to nontraditional and emerging scholarship that's citable in Wikipedia.

Confirmed panelists:


Academic Peer Review option:

Yes

Author name:

A. Britton

E-mail address:

ab16302020@gmail.com

Wikimedia username:

Affiliated organization(s):

Estimated time:

45 minutes

Preferred room size:

Special requests:

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:

Not exactly. I presented a poster on "Wikidata for Digital Scholarship" at the 2019 Boston Area Digital Scholarship Symposium.

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

Yes