Submissions:2019/Quality vs Usefulness: Can we have more FAs on vital topics?
- Quality vs Usefulness: Can we have more FAs on vital topics?
- Reliability of Information
Type of session:
- Lightning Talk
Is there a trend that numerous high-quality articles are written about very specialized topics (e.g. a specific battle or historical biography), while general articles that are useful to a wide audience (e.g. "vital" articles) does not get as much quality? A quick look based on comparing FA/GA status and view count statistics indicates some evidence for this, at least for recent years.
Academic Peer Review option:
- Use "Email this user" function
- 5 mins
Preferred room size:
Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:
If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)
- only enough content here for a short (lightning talk) session