Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2019/Building a Scholarly Knowledge Base with Wikidata: A Case Study from Vanderbilt University"

From WikiConference North America
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎top: Submission accepted)
(<center>{{tag|This session is part of the WikiCite track.}}</center>)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
<center>{{tag|This session is part of the [[Submissions:2019/WikiCite track|WikiCite track]].}}</center>
 
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission
 
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission
 
|status=Accepted
 
|status=Accepted

Revision as of 01:27, 27 October 2019

This session is part of the WikiCite track.

This submission has been accepted for WikiConference North America 2019.



Title:

Building a Scholarly Knowledge Base with Wikidata: A Case Study from Vanderbilt University

Theme:

Relationship Building & Support
+ Tech & Tools

Type of session:

Panel

Abstract:

Can Wikidata provide an alternative to proprietary research information systems for evaluating scholarly production and impact? The panelists, who are all librarians at Vanderbilt University, explore the potential of using Wikidata to collect and track the disparate research outputs of faculty and staff at a Carnegie Research-Intensive (R1) university.

The effort to use linked data to measure scholarly productivity is not new. Through the activities of a library-sponsored linked data working group over the past several years, members of the panel have learned to create linked data by generating resource description framework (RDF) serializations from simple tabular files and to use those data for tracking research outputs by querying them with the SPARQL query language. While they developed the capacity to perform those queries programmatically, the overhead of writing data in RDF, loading it into an RDF triple store, and querying it with SPARQL proved too cumbersome for practical daily use.

Inspired by the use of Wikidata for scholarly communications at Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), the panelists investigated Wikidata as an alternative to generic linked data tools. By turning to Wikidata, the panelists could apply what they had learned from their work with linked data in a more user-friendly environment. By using Wikidata as a hub for scholarly data, librarians at Vanderbilt can now programmatically access and collect information about Vanderbilt researchers from ORCID and about their publications from DOI registry services like CrossRef. The panelists are currently working towards partially or fully automating the aggregation of those data with existing Wikidata items, then transforming those tabular data to be consistent with the Wikibase data model so that new data can be uploaded to Wikidata using tools like OpenRefine and software bots.

The librarians on this panel will speak from their practical experience using linked data principles for tracking scholarly research and share how the decision to build their workflows around Wikidata has increased their productivity while also making their activities more accessible and comprehensible to colleagues. This panel will be of interest to librarians and higher educational professionals interested in using Wikidata to measure and evaluate scholarly productivity.

Panelists:

  • Clifford B. Anderson, Vanderbilt University (user:Clifford_Anderson)
  • Steve Baskauf, Vanderbilt University (User:Baskaufs)
  • Elisabeth Shook, Vanderbilt University (user: Eshook)

Academic Peer Review option:

Yes

Author name:

Clifford B. Anderson, Steve Baskauf, and Elisabeth Shook

E-mail address:

clifford.anderson@vanderbilt.edu

Wikimedia username:

Clifford Anderson

Affiliated organization(s):

Vanderbilt University Library

Estimated time:

30 minutes

Preferred room size:

30 people

Special requests:

None

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:

No

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

No