Edit 2019/Quality vs Usefulness: Can we have more FAs on vital topics?: Submissions:2019/How can Africa and North America partner to promote the goals of the Foundation

Jump to navigation Jump to search
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.

Warning: This page already exists, but it does not use this form.

This submission has been designated as a lightning talk at WikiConference North America 2019.



Title:

How can Africa and North America partner to promote the goals of the Foundation

Theme:

Reliability of Information
+ Other

Type of session:

Lightning Talk

Abstract:

Is there a trend that numerous high-quality articles are written about very specialized topics (e.g. a specific battle or historical biography), while general articles that are useful to a wide audience (e.g. "vital" articles) does not get as much quality? A quick look based on comparing FA/GA status and view count statistics indicates some evidence for this, at least for recent years.

Relevant links: https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:ENFA https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:ENGA

Academic Peer Review option:

No

Author name:

HaEr48

E-mail address:

Use "Email this user" function

Wikimedia username:

HaEr48

Affiliated organization(s):

Estimated time:

5 mins

Preferred room size:

Special requests:

Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:

If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)

only enough content here for a short (lightning talk) session




Cancel
Retrieved from "https://wikiconference.org/wiki/Special:FormEdit"