Difference between revisions of "Submissions:2019/What's neutrality?: An epistemological discussion about advocacy and free knowledge in Spanish Wikipedia"
(Created page with "{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission |theme=Reliability of Information<br /> |type=Presentation |abstract=What motivates a person to edit about climate change, feminism, heritage, a...") |
SuperHamster (talk | contribs) (Status update) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission |
{{WCNA 2019 Session Submission |
||
| + | |status=Declined |
||
|theme=Reliability of Information<br /> |
|theme=Reliability of Information<br /> |
||
|type=Presentation |
|type=Presentation |
||
| − | |abstract=What motivates a person to edit about climate change, feminism, heritage, among other topics |
+ | |abstract=What motivates a person to edit about climate change, feminism, heritage, among other topics, in Spanish Wikipedia? Communities edit Wikimedia projects because they think certain topics matter. If the very election of a theme is a political stand by itself –because we are actively deciding what's worth preserving– , can the production of knowledge still be considered as 'neutral' from an epistemological standpoint? |
| + | |||
| + | This issue is particularly relevant in the Global South, due to some problems such as lack of references or "unreliable" sources. The goal of this presentation is to discuss if the use of es.wiki projects for advocating can still be reliable, and how we should be moving from a so-called 'neutrality' approach into an accountability perspective. I'll show some examples of people using es.wiki projects to make visible certain topics (hence, taking a non-neutral approach) by creating high-quality content and helping to "fill the gap" in knowledge production without compromising the rigourosity of the encyclopedia. |
||
|academic=No |
|academic=No |
||
|author=Pepe Flores |
|author=Pepe Flores |
||
Latest revision as of 20:12, 13 October 2019
Due to limited space, WikiConference North America 2019 unfortunately could not accommodate this submission in its program this year.
Please check out our Unconference for opportunities to present and share there.
Title:
- What's neutrality?: An epistemological discussion about advocacy and free knowledge in Spanish Wikipedia
Theme:
- Reliability of Information
Type of session:
- Presentation
Abstract:
What motivates a person to edit about climate change, feminism, heritage, among other topics, in Spanish Wikipedia? Communities edit Wikimedia projects because they think certain topics matter. If the very election of a theme is a political stand by itself –because we are actively deciding what's worth preserving– , can the production of knowledge still be considered as 'neutral' from an epistemological standpoint?
This issue is particularly relevant in the Global South, due to some problems such as lack of references or "unreliable" sources. The goal of this presentation is to discuss if the use of es.wiki projects for advocating can still be reliable, and how we should be moving from a so-called 'neutrality' approach into an accountability perspective. I'll show some examples of people using es.wiki projects to make visible certain topics (hence, taking a non-neutral approach) by creating high-quality content and helping to "fill the gap" in knowledge production without compromising the rigourosity of the encyclopedia.
Academic Peer Review option:
- No
Author name:
E-mail address:
- pepe.fls
gmail.com
Wikimedia username:
- padaguan
Affiliated organization(s):
- Wikimedia Mexico
Estimated time:
- 30 minutes
Preferred room size:
- 30-40 persons
Special requests:
- None
Have you presented on this topic previously? If yes, where/when?:
- No, but it's the byproduct of several discussions during Wikimania 2019
If your submission is not accepted, would you be open to presenting your topic in another part of the program? (e.g. lightning talk or unconference session)
- Yes