Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • * less maintenance overhead/steep learning curve for users ** signing up for wikiprojects allows for targeted notifications/messages to users who have signed up (currently these are separate signups with separate impl
    2 KB (300 words) - 17:57, 20 October 2018
  • ** Matches a pattern of spam users. Wrongly blocked? Explain on your user talk page.
    337 bytes (42 words) - 15:13, 21 April 2020
  • ..., the circulation of news through social media has made it more likely for users to be exposed to news sources with which they are not acquainted and theref ...bility assessment on an article, it propagates that information to all the users that either immediately trust or have an indirect trust path to the assesso
    3 KB (463 words) - 09:42, 4 October 2019
  • ...ove its interface and launch a marketing campaign on Facebook that reaches users in that age group ...messaging systems. In addition, it reinforces the basic knowledge of these users to detect fake news and curb disinformation.
    2 KB (369 words) - 21:08, 19 March 2020
  • ...rlicoss/promnesia is already well-estabilished, with estimated hundreds of users, and it is under active development. It's main developer uses it daily. ...of the idea of "read write web". Other projects trying to give web browser users an alternative opinion exist. Approaches range from trying to provide centr
    2 KB (324 words) - 17:26, 2 March 2021
  • # This is a title blacklist. Titles and users that match a regular expression here cannot be created.
    550 bytes (54 words) - 12:05, 8 August 2017
  • * join monthly web/phone call (2nd Fridays at 2pm) for federal govt mediawiki users
    539 bytes (77 words) - 16:52, 11 October 2015
  • ...al expressions. Besides, there are also disputes and even quarrels between users in terms of explanations for concrete components of ‘nation-ness’ and (
    3 KB (382 words) - 20:43, 17 October 2023
  • ...present this current attempt to succeed in delivering Wikimedia content to users who cannot access it online.
    2 KB (304 words) - 13:24, 28 April 2020
  • * These users aren't vandals, they are disruptive - pushing an agenda or pushing the limi * Productizing this would take a policy change on ENWP — right now banned users are allowed to revert vandalism or BLP violations
    4 KB (610 words) - 21:22, 18 August 2017
  • ...used across all Wikimedia projects and language versions. The tool allows users access to the full catalog of relevant, tagged images on Wikimedia Commons ...e development process and discuss ways View it! has been found helpful for users. Participants will be invited to try the tool for themselves, and discuss w
    2 KB (333 words) - 20:08, 8 November 2023
  • ...d not to favor the inclusion of new users, and not to accept the return of users with indefinite blocking. I do not pretend to show a generalist or quantita
    3 KB (471 words) - 04:08, 7 October 2021
  • * [[User:Econterms/Responses by en.wp users to proposal for banner on net neutrality issue]] - WikiConference 2018 ...rms/Federal government MediaWiki users]] -- an invitation to US government users to work together -- lightning talk at WikiConference USA 2015
    2 KB (315 words) - 20:00, 16 December 2022
  • ...onduct over time. This project will create a tool which can identify these users. This will reduce the load on volunteers as they currently need to go throu ...loping a system that will ingest information in an online fashion and flag users that have reputation scores that are decreasing. This could be integrated i
    5 KB (812 words) - 08:48, 8 April 2020
  • ...the difference in user behaviour of blocked users versus known good users (users with certain roles). I would then like to integrate this with the incoming ...bove egregiousness but more beyond in terms of typifying types of accounts/users, which seems to me to introduce a kind of risk. Can you speak a little to
    7 KB (1,138 words) - 00:44, 10 April 2020
  • ...page and topic bans, which are formal prohibitions assigned to problematic users, prohibiting them from editing a specific page or collection of pages.
    2 KB (252 words) - 17:45, 23 July 2017
  • ...used across all Wikimedia projects and language versions. The tool allows users access to the full catalog of relevant, tagged images on Wikimedia Commons
    2 KB (262 words) - 16:30, 2 November 2022
  • ...user-centered approach to addressing credibility. We will examine how end-users respond to different types of credibility signals when we vary the presenta ...in many ways preferable to systems that spot and remove misinformation for users, as it
    7 KB (1,051 words) - 02:10, 9 May 2020
  • ...ans, users can report the misconduct to wiki leadership (other experienced users, administrators, and in extreme cases stewards or Wikimedia Foundation staf ...vide a reporting system for Wikimedia communities that puts less stress on users who are submitting the reports while simultaneously generating higher-quali
    3 KB (477 words) - 08:20, 10 September 2018
  • ...hat monitors whether the topic-induced-network is unbiased and thus allows users to get a neutral overview of the field.  ...about the topic. In particular, the question we want to address is whether users' navigation paths are biased toward one of the possible perspectives. To gi
    3 KB (508 words) - 15:45, 31 October 2019

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)